From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29603C0032E for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 20:00:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229776AbjJYUAK (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Oct 2023 16:00:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41718 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229629AbjJYUAJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Oct 2023 16:00:09 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6CCC93 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 13:00:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1698264007; x=1729800007; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=DGXUWUSHMgJ97h7udElY6Kgr44+FnSqfERyPf7jHRCI=; b=mJwmV8f+IdxybKXiGtXREGbTDOVASZCQ7X1xufO7yIvbVBjxgxdDt2Bu KXC6FfGSPpGsW7WeKspQl3ejmZfVchQ+LtcWYkKRo8ZBRI31RZIYG0Cz1 376dOBw56VsrDFjzdQvMJWgsqe1IY4CHRN76E+k/FM5YXhpkKKwg3IKha h8TEq57d5Ol7w0H52UcS5bZv6y9A/u/duFlg40KrGvuyJX1U6gdszwm6f niQ3+eEwUUKhWX95PSsEvp9d3UoYVvP0CJlUWb7FMzWw0UrwH+LyUT5Tl SmLoW41p9uJ1Onn6d+eG3L1jCJ7BChn9e7Pgm96WB67TvIINGtLQ51089 Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10874"; a="390247879" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,250,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="390247879" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Oct 2023 13:00:07 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10874"; a="932478031" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,250,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="932478031" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Oct 2023 13:00:03 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97-RC3) (envelope-from ) id 1qvk2q-00000008fo4-2DjU; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 23:00:00 +0300 Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 23:00:00 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Bingbu Cao Cc: bingbu.cao@intel.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, hdegoede@redhat.com, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, andreaskleist@gmail.com, claus.stovgaard@gmail.com, tfiga@chromium.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org, tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com, tian.shu.qiu@intel.com, hongju.wang@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/15] media: add Kconfig and Makefile for IPU6 Message-ID: References: <20231024112924.3934228-1-bingbu.cao@intel.com> <20231024112924.3934228-13-bingbu.cao@intel.com> <840ba517-4739-16ed-9d00-f79a3e6016fb@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <840ba517-4739-16ed-9d00-f79a3e6016fb@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 04:43:16PM +0800, Bingbu Cao wrote: > On 10/24/23 9:04 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 07:29:21PM +0800, bingbu.cao@intel.com wrote: ... > > > >> + depends on X86 && X86_64 > > > > How is that? One is a superset of the other IIUC. > > It's trying to prevent build IPU6 with other arch such as 'UM'. > > # make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=um olddefconfig > ipu6-dma.c:... error: implicit declaration of function 'clflush_cache_range'; Is UM ever supported 64-bit builds? > X86_64 looks like not an actual architecture. How comes? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko