From: Jim Harris <jim.harris@samsung.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org" <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl/region: Refactor logic around check_last_peer()
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 22:37:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTmYswn9afRy/SCF@ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6538824b52349_7258329466@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 07:49:47PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> It turns out this patch fails cxl-region-sysfs.sh.
>
> test/cxl-region-sysfs.sh: failed at line 94
>
> [ 38.367581] check_last_peer: cxl region8: cxl_host_bridge.0:port4: mem5:decoder15.1 pos 4 mismatched peer mem7:decoder17.0
>
> This patch looked so appetizing that I really wanted it to be a bug in
> the test and not a bug in this patch, but I think it is the latter.
>
> > @@ -1111,20 +1111,17 @@ static int cxl_port_setup_targets(struct cxl_port *port,
> >
> > cxlsd = to_cxl_switch_decoder(&cxld->dev);
> > if (cxl_rr->nr_targets_set) {
> > - int i, distance;
> > + int i;
> >
> > /*
> > - * Passthrough decoders impose no distance requirements between
> > - * peers
> > + * Check if this endpoint's dport is already in the
> > + * switch decoder's target list, and if so check that
> > + * it is positioned correctly based on the switch's
> > + * interleave.
> > */
> > - if (cxl_rr->nr_targets == 1)
> > - distance = 0;
> > - else
> > - distance = p->nr_targets / cxl_rr->nr_targets;
>
> This calculation is essentially doing the "top-down" version of the
> "bottom-up" position calculation Alison introduced in her proposed region
> assembly fixes:
>
> for_each_parent_port(...)
> pos = pos * parent_ways + parent_pos
>
> So in a x8 region across 2x HBs with 2x switches per HB. The "distance"
> of peers at the switch level is 4. This change makes that 2.
>
> Maybe the right conceptual cleanup is to still ditch this distance
> calculation based on "p->nr_targets / cxl_rr->nr_targets" and walk up
> from this port and multiply the local ways by all the ancestral ways,
> but as is this gets the answer with less steps (modulo all the work to
> build up @ep and @cxl_rr).
Thanks Dan. I'll run with that and push out a v2.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-25 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20231010194652uscas1p18968f3a66d8cbe6d76dd444aa3ec50aa@uscas1p1.samsung.com>
2023-10-10 19:46 ` [PATCH] cxl/region: Refactor logic around check_last_peer() Jim Harris
2023-10-25 2:49 ` Dan Williams
2023-10-25 22:37 ` Jim Harris [this message]
2023-11-01 5:12 ` Jim Harris
2023-11-01 5:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Jim Harris
2023-11-02 22:42 ` Alison Schofield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZTmYswn9afRy/SCF@ubuntu \
--to=jim.harris@samsung.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.