All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
To: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhang Xiong <xiong.y.zhang@intel.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests Patch 0/5] Fix PMU test failures on Sapphire Rapids
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 23:47:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTmo9IVM2Tq6ZSrn@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231024075748.1675382-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023, Dapeng Mi wrote:
> When running pmu test on Intel Sapphire Rapids, we found several
> failures are encountered, such as "llc misses" failure, "all counters"
> failure and "fixed counter 3" failure.

hmm, I have tested your series on a SPR machine. It looks like, all "llc
misses" already pass on my side. "all counters" always fail with/without
your patches. "fixed counter 3" never exists... I have "fixed
cntr-{0,1,2}" and "fixed-{0,1,2}"

You may want to double check the requirements of your series. Not just
under your setting without explainning those setting in detail.

Maybe what I am missing is your topdown series? So, before your topdown
series checked in. I don't see value in this series.

Thanks.
-Mingwei
> 
> Intel Sapphire Rapids introduces new fixed counter 3, total PMU counters
> including GP and fixed counters increase to 12 and also optimizes cache
> subsystem. All these changes make the original assumptions in pmu test
> unavailable any more on Sapphire Rapids. Patches 2-4 fixes these
> failures, patch 0 remove the duplicate code and patch 5 adds assert to
> ensure predefine fixed events are matched with HW fixed counters.
> 
> Dapeng Mi (4):
>   x86: pmu: Change the minimum value of llc_misses event to 0
>   x86: pmu: Enlarge cnt array length to 64 in check_counters_many()
>   x86: pmu: Support validation for Intel PMU fixed counter 3
>   x86: pmu: Add asserts to warn inconsistent fixed events and counters
> 
> Xiong Zhang (1):
>   x86: pmu: Remove duplicate code in pmu_init()
> 
>  lib/x86/pmu.c |  5 -----
>  x86/pmu.c     | 17 ++++++++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> base-commit: bfe5d7d0e14c8199d134df84d6ae8487a9772c48
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-25 23:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-24  7:57 [kvm-unit-tests Patch 0/5] Fix PMU test failures on Sapphire Rapids Dapeng Mi
2023-10-24  7:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests Patch 1/5] x86: pmu: Remove duplicate code in pmu_init() Dapeng Mi
2023-10-24  7:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests Patch 2/5] x86: pmu: Change the minimum value of llc_misses event to 0 Dapeng Mi
2023-10-24 13:03   ` Jim Mattson
2023-10-25 11:22     ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-10-25 12:35       ` Jim Mattson
2023-10-26  2:14         ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-10-26 12:19           ` Jim Mattson
2023-10-27 10:17             ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-10-24  7:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests Patch 3/5] x86: pmu: Enlarge cnt array length to 64 in check_counters_many() Dapeng Mi
2023-10-24  7:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests Patch 4/5] x86: pmu: Support validation for Intel PMU fixed counter 3 Dapeng Mi
2023-10-24 19:05   ` Jim Mattson
2023-10-25 11:26     ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-10-25 12:38       ` Jim Mattson
2023-10-26  2:29         ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-10-24  7:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests Patch 5/5] x86: pmu: Add asserts to warn inconsistent fixed events and counters Dapeng Mi
2023-10-25 23:47 ` Mingwei Zhang [this message]
2023-10-26  3:32   ` [kvm-unit-tests Patch 0/5] Fix PMU test failures on Sapphire Rapids Mi, Dapeng
2023-10-30  3:57     ` Mingwei Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZTmo9IVM2Tq6ZSrn@google.com \
    --to=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=xiong.y.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.