All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <ZULJYg5cf1UrNq3e@google.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index c95cd48..618025a 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ that is still owned by guest_memfd.
 E.g. a misbehaving userspace could prematurely delete a memslot.  And the more
 fun example is intrahost migration, where the plan is to allow pointing multiple
 guest_memfd files at a single guest_memfd inode:
-https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1691446946.git.ackerleytng at google.com
+https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1691446946.git.ackerleytng@google.com
 
 There was a lot of discussion for this, but it's scattered all over the place.
 The TL;DR is is that the inode will represent physical memory, and a file will
@@ -66,4 +66,4 @@ represent a given "struct kvm" instance's view of that memory.  And so the memor
 isn't reclaimed until the inode is truncated/punched.
 
 I _think_ this reflects the most recent plan from the guest_memfd side:
-https://lore.kernel.org/all/1233d749211c08d51f9ca5d427938d47f008af1f.1689893403.git.isaku.yamahata at intel.com
+https://lore.kernel.org/all/1233d749211c08d51f9ca5d427938d47f008af1f.1689893403.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index dfa738a..645f484 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -4,9 +4,52 @@
  "ref\0ZUF8A5KpwpA6IKUH@google.com\0"
  "ref\0CA+EHjTwTT9cFzYTtwT43nLJS01Sgt0NqzUgKAnfo2fiV3tEvXg@mail.gmail.com\0"
  "From\0Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH v13 16/35] KVM: Add KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD ioctl() for guest-specific backing memory\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v13 16/35] KVM: Add KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD ioctl() for guest-specific backing memory\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 1 Nov 2023 14:55:46 -0700\0"
- "To\0kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>"
+  Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
+  Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
+  Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
+  Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
+  Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
+  Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
+  Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
+  Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
+  Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
+  Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
+  Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
+  Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
+  kvm@vger.kernel.org
+  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+  kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
+  linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
+  linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
+  kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org
+  linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
+  linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
+  linux-mm@kvack.org
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+  Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
+  Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>
+  Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
+  Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
+  Anish Moorthy <amoorthy@google.com>
+  David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
+  Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
+  Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
+ " Micka\303\253l Sala\303\274n <mic@digikod.net>"
+  Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
+  Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>
+  Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
+  Maciej Szmigiero <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
+  David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
+  Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
+  Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
+  Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
+  Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@oracle.com>
+  Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>
+ " Kirill A . Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Wed, Nov 01, 2023, Fuad Tabba wrote:\n"
@@ -69,7 +112,7 @@
  "E.g. a misbehaving userspace could prematurely delete a memslot.  And the more\n"
  "fun example is intrahost migration, where the plan is to allow pointing multiple\n"
  "guest_memfd files at a single guest_memfd inode:\n"
- "https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1691446946.git.ackerleytng at google.com\n"
+ "https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1691446946.git.ackerleytng@google.com\n"
  "\n"
  "There was a lot of discussion for this, but it's scattered all over the place.\n"
  "The TL;DR is is that the inode will represent physical memory, and a file will\n"
@@ -77,6 +120,6 @@
  "isn't reclaimed until the inode is truncated/punched.\n"
  "\n"
  "I _think_ this reflects the most recent plan from the guest_memfd side:\n"
- https://lore.kernel.org/all/1233d749211c08d51f9ca5d427938d47f008af1f.1689893403.git.isaku.yamahata at intel.com
+ https://lore.kernel.org/all/1233d749211c08d51f9ca5d427938d47f008af1f.1689893403.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com
 
-1f0c36f4bc3674583f26b85d0a5bec59169bf54ee8876f494e50738fb7d4a6b0
+15cf3437102b310ae359505f0db8de37a4db3a7b2198778bede50a269a432198

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index c95cd48..a745dfb 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ that is still owned by guest_memfd.
 E.g. a misbehaving userspace could prematurely delete a memslot.  And the more
 fun example is intrahost migration, where the plan is to allow pointing multiple
 guest_memfd files at a single guest_memfd inode:
-https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1691446946.git.ackerleytng at google.com
+https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1691446946.git.ackerleytng@google.com
 
 There was a lot of discussion for this, but it's scattered all over the place.
 The TL;DR is is that the inode will represent physical memory, and a file will
@@ -66,4 +66,9 @@ represent a given "struct kvm" instance's view of that memory.  And so the memor
 isn't reclaimed until the inode is truncated/punched.
 
 I _think_ this reflects the most recent plan from the guest_memfd side:
-https://lore.kernel.org/all/1233d749211c08d51f9ca5d427938d47f008af1f.1689893403.git.isaku.yamahata at intel.com
+https://lore.kernel.org/all/1233d749211c08d51f9ca5d427938d47f008af1f.1689893403.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com
+
+_______________________________________________
+linux-riscv mailing list
+linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
+http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index dfa738a..5b3eb5c 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -4,9 +4,52 @@
  "ref\0ZUF8A5KpwpA6IKUH@google.com\0"
  "ref\0CA+EHjTwTT9cFzYTtwT43nLJS01Sgt0NqzUgKAnfo2fiV3tEvXg@mail.gmail.com\0"
  "From\0Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH v13 16/35] KVM: Add KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD ioctl() for guest-specific backing memory\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v13 16/35] KVM: Add KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD ioctl() for guest-specific backing memory\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 1 Nov 2023 14:55:46 -0700\0"
- "To\0kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>"
+  Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
+  Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
+  Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
+  Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
+  Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
+  Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
+  Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
+  Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
+  Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
+  Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
+  Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
+  Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
+  kvm@vger.kernel.org
+  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+  kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
+  linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
+  linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
+  kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org
+  linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
+  linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
+  linux-mm@kvack.org
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+  Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
+  Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>
+  Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
+  Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
+  Anish Moorthy <amoorthy@google.com>
+  David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
+  Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
+  Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
+ " Micka\303\253l Sala\303\274n <mic@digikod.net>"
+  Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
+  Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>
+  Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
+  Maciej Szmigiero <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
+  David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
+  Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
+  Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
+  Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
+  Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@oracle.com>
+  Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>
+ " Kirill A . Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Wed, Nov 01, 2023, Fuad Tabba wrote:\n"
@@ -69,7 +112,7 @@
  "E.g. a misbehaving userspace could prematurely delete a memslot.  And the more\n"
  "fun example is intrahost migration, where the plan is to allow pointing multiple\n"
  "guest_memfd files at a single guest_memfd inode:\n"
- "https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1691446946.git.ackerleytng at google.com\n"
+ "https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1691446946.git.ackerleytng@google.com\n"
  "\n"
  "There was a lot of discussion for this, but it's scattered all over the place.\n"
  "The TL;DR is is that the inode will represent physical memory, and a file will\n"
@@ -77,6 +120,11 @@
  "isn't reclaimed until the inode is truncated/punched.\n"
  "\n"
  "I _think_ this reflects the most recent plan from the guest_memfd side:\n"
- https://lore.kernel.org/all/1233d749211c08d51f9ca5d427938d47f008af1f.1689893403.git.isaku.yamahata at intel.com
+ "https://lore.kernel.org/all/1233d749211c08d51f9ca5d427938d47f008af1f.1689893403.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "linux-riscv mailing list\n"
+ "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org\n"
+ http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
 
-1f0c36f4bc3674583f26b85d0a5bec59169bf54ee8876f494e50738fb7d4a6b0
+7174be36da0c317ac121af6c33d715330686531845606d9c7f9433e752be7fc4

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N3/1.txt
index c95cd48..618025a 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N3/1.txt
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ that is still owned by guest_memfd.
 E.g. a misbehaving userspace could prematurely delete a memslot.  And the more
 fun example is intrahost migration, where the plan is to allow pointing multiple
 guest_memfd files at a single guest_memfd inode:
-https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1691446946.git.ackerleytng at google.com
+https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1691446946.git.ackerleytng@google.com
 
 There was a lot of discussion for this, but it's scattered all over the place.
 The TL;DR is is that the inode will represent physical memory, and a file will
@@ -66,4 +66,4 @@ represent a given "struct kvm" instance's view of that memory.  And so the memor
 isn't reclaimed until the inode is truncated/punched.
 
 I _think_ this reflects the most recent plan from the guest_memfd side:
-https://lore.kernel.org/all/1233d749211c08d51f9ca5d427938d47f008af1f.1689893403.git.isaku.yamahata at intel.com
+https://lore.kernel.org/all/1233d749211c08d51f9ca5d427938d47f008af1f.1689893403.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest
index dfa738a..c38c639 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N3/content_digest
@@ -4,9 +4,36 @@
  "ref\0ZUF8A5KpwpA6IKUH@google.com\0"
  "ref\0CA+EHjTwTT9cFzYTtwT43nLJS01Sgt0NqzUgKAnfo2fiV3tEvXg@mail.gmail.com\0"
  "From\0Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH v13 16/35] KVM: Add KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD ioctl() for guest-specific backing memory\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v13 16/35] KVM: Add KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD ioctl() for guest-specific backing memory\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 1 Nov 2023 14:55:46 -0700\0"
- "To\0kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0kvm@vger.kernel.org"
+  David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+  linux-mm@kvack.org
+  Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
+  linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
+  Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>
+  Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
+  Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
+  Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
+  Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
+  Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
+  Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
+  Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
+  Maciej Szmigiero <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
+  Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
+  Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
+  Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
+  Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
+  Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
+  kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
+  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+ " Micka\303\253l Sala\303\274n <mic@digikod.net>"
+  Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
+  Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
+  Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
+ " Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@oracl>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Wed, Nov 01, 2023, Fuad Tabba wrote:\n"
@@ -69,7 +96,7 @@
  "E.g. a misbehaving userspace could prematurely delete a memslot.  And the more\n"
  "fun example is intrahost migration, where the plan is to allow pointing multiple\n"
  "guest_memfd files at a single guest_memfd inode:\n"
- "https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1691446946.git.ackerleytng at google.com\n"
+ "https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1691446946.git.ackerleytng@google.com\n"
  "\n"
  "There was a lot of discussion for this, but it's scattered all over the place.\n"
  "The TL;DR is is that the inode will represent physical memory, and a file will\n"
@@ -77,6 +104,6 @@
  "isn't reclaimed until the inode is truncated/punched.\n"
  "\n"
  "I _think_ this reflects the most recent plan from the guest_memfd side:\n"
- https://lore.kernel.org/all/1233d749211c08d51f9ca5d427938d47f008af1f.1689893403.git.isaku.yamahata at intel.com
+ https://lore.kernel.org/all/1233d749211c08d51f9ca5d427938d47f008af1f.1689893403.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com
 
-1f0c36f4bc3674583f26b85d0a5bec59169bf54ee8876f494e50738fb7d4a6b0
+2e2497e2470d954921c71d5db9b9324f067c17db1d55746ed47541fa50597df3

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N4/1.txt
index c95cd48..7e943a6 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N4/1.txt
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ that is still owned by guest_memfd.
 E.g. a misbehaving userspace could prematurely delete a memslot.  And the more
 fun example is intrahost migration, where the plan is to allow pointing multiple
 guest_memfd files at a single guest_memfd inode:
-https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1691446946.git.ackerleytng at google.com
+https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1691446946.git.ackerleytng@google.com
 
 There was a lot of discussion for this, but it's scattered all over the place.
 The TL;DR is is that the inode will represent physical memory, and a file will
@@ -66,4 +66,9 @@ represent a given "struct kvm" instance's view of that memory.  And so the memor
 isn't reclaimed until the inode is truncated/punched.
 
 I _think_ this reflects the most recent plan from the guest_memfd side:
-https://lore.kernel.org/all/1233d749211c08d51f9ca5d427938d47f008af1f.1689893403.git.isaku.yamahata at intel.com
+https://lore.kernel.org/all/1233d749211c08d51f9ca5d427938d47f008af1f.1689893403.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com
+
+_______________________________________________
+linux-arm-kernel mailing list
+linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N4/content_digest
index dfa738a..091b1fb 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N4/content_digest
@@ -4,9 +4,52 @@
  "ref\0ZUF8A5KpwpA6IKUH@google.com\0"
  "ref\0CA+EHjTwTT9cFzYTtwT43nLJS01Sgt0NqzUgKAnfo2fiV3tEvXg@mail.gmail.com\0"
  "From\0Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH v13 16/35] KVM: Add KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD ioctl() for guest-specific backing memory\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v13 16/35] KVM: Add KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD ioctl() for guest-specific backing memory\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 1 Nov 2023 14:55:46 -0700\0"
- "To\0kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>"
+  Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
+  Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
+  Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
+  Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
+  Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
+  Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
+  Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
+  Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
+  Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
+  Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
+  Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
+  Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
+  kvm@vger.kernel.org
+  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+  kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
+  linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
+  linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
+  kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org
+  linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
+  linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
+  linux-mm@kvack.org
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+  Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
+  Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>
+  Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
+  Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
+  Anish Moorthy <amoorthy@google.com>
+  David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
+  Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
+  Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
+ " Micka\303\253l Sala\303\274n <mic@digikod.net>"
+  Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
+  Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>
+  Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
+  Maciej Szmigiero <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
+  David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
+  Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
+  Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
+  Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
+  Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@oracle.com>
+  Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>
+ " Kirill A . Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Wed, Nov 01, 2023, Fuad Tabba wrote:\n"
@@ -69,7 +112,7 @@
  "E.g. a misbehaving userspace could prematurely delete a memslot.  And the more\n"
  "fun example is intrahost migration, where the plan is to allow pointing multiple\n"
  "guest_memfd files at a single guest_memfd inode:\n"
- "https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1691446946.git.ackerleytng at google.com\n"
+ "https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1691446946.git.ackerleytng@google.com\n"
  "\n"
  "There was a lot of discussion for this, but it's scattered all over the place.\n"
  "The TL;DR is is that the inode will represent physical memory, and a file will\n"
@@ -77,6 +120,11 @@
  "isn't reclaimed until the inode is truncated/punched.\n"
  "\n"
  "I _think_ this reflects the most recent plan from the guest_memfd side:\n"
- https://lore.kernel.org/all/1233d749211c08d51f9ca5d427938d47f008af1f.1689893403.git.isaku.yamahata at intel.com
+ "https://lore.kernel.org/all/1233d749211c08d51f9ca5d427938d47f008af1f.1689893403.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n"
+ "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n"
+ http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
 
-1f0c36f4bc3674583f26b85d0a5bec59169bf54ee8876f494e50738fb7d4a6b0
+4a986a56411cf5c740bd80f27f0dfc59126019b9b87a636402e2930e168ca1b3

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.