From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 9D99E41B13 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 29DCE417C0 Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 11:30:03 +0100 From: Beata Michalska Message-ID: References: <20231027080400.56703-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <20231027080400.56703-8-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Acpica-devel] [PATCH v4 7/7] arm64/amu: use capacity_ref_freq to set AMU ratio List-Id: "This is the central place for ACPICA developer discussions and issues." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Vincent Guittot Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, robert.moore@intel.com, bsegall@google.com, conor.dooley@microchip.com, pierre.gondois@arm.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, will@kernel.org, acpica-devel@lists.linuxfoundation.org, vschneid@redhat.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, mgorman@suse.de, lftan@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, lenb@kernel.org, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, ionela.voinescu@arm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, suagrfillet@gmail.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com, bristot@redhat.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com Hi Vincent, On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 10:04:27AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote: > Hi Beata, > > On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 at 00:59, Beata Michalska wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 10:04:00AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > > Use the new capacity_ref_freq to set the ratio that is used by AMU for > > > computing the arch_scale_freq_capacity(). > > > This helps to keep everything aligned using the same reference for > > > computing CPUs capacity. > > > > > [..] > > > > @@ -381,6 +385,9 @@ void topology_init_cpu_capacity_cppc(void) > > > } > > > > > > for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { > > > + freq_inv_set_max_ratio(cpu, > > > + per_cpu(capacity_ref_freq, cpu) * HZ_PER_KHZ); > > > + > > The capacity_ref_freq set earlier will still lead to units mismatch, > > as at the point of calling topology_init_cpu_capacity_cppc the lowest & nominal > > frequencies will be provided in MHz (unless I have missed smth). > > I don't get your point: > the unit of per_cpu(capacity_freq_ref, cpu) is Khz > > For cppc, we have > per_cpu(capacity_freq_ref, cpu) = cppc_perf_to_khz(&perf_caps, > raw_capacity[cpu]); > > freq_inv_set_max_ratio() uses > arch_timer_get_rate() which returns a freq in Hz > and > per_cpu(capacity_freq_ref, cpu) * HZ_PER_KHZ. to get a freq in Hz too. > Apologies, I should have been more verbose here. Before the change made in [1] the cppc_perf_to_khz was indeed operating on lowest & nominal frequency values expressed in kHZ, as those were appropriately amended: cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init |__> cppc_cpufreq_get_cpu_data: |__> ... /* Convert the lowest and nominal freq from MHz to KHz */ cpu_data->perf_caps.lowest_freq *= 1000; cpu_data->perf_caps.nominal_freq *= 1000; So far cppc_perf_to_khz (previously cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz) was being called with the post-processed CPC data (through cppc_cpufreq_get_cpu_data) and thus guaranteed to be operating on values in kHz. With the new changes the cppc_perf_to_khz will operate on raw CPC data, which are expressed in MHz.(as per acpi spec) --- Best Regards B. > > This means that use of both, the capacity_ref_freq and the arch_freq_scale > > will generate unexpected results, so I guess this should get amended in the > > preceding patch (?) [1] > > > > --- > > BR > > B. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20231027080400.56703-4-vincent.guittot@linaro.org/T/#m42daa167097edc190b1cfc05382c385ed801d909 > > > > > capacity = raw_capacity[cpu]; > > > capacity = div64_u64(capacity << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT, > > > capacity_scale); > > > @@ -422,8 +429,11 @@ init_cpu_capacity_callback(struct notifier_block *nb, > > > > > > cpumask_andnot(cpus_to_visit, cpus_to_visit, policy->related_cpus); > > > > > > - for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus) > > > + for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus) { > > > per_cpu(capacity_ref_freq, cpu) = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; > > > + freq_inv_set_max_ratio(cpu, > > > + per_cpu(capacity_ref_freq, cpu) * HZ_PER_KHZ); > > > + } > > > > > > if (cpumask_empty(cpus_to_visit)) { > > > topology_normalize_cpu_scale(); > > > diff --git a/include/linux/arch_topology.h b/include/linux/arch_topology.h > > > index 38ca6c76af56..ffdf0b7c55fa 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/arch_topology.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/arch_topology.h > > > @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpu); > > > void remove_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid); > > > void reset_cpu_topology(void); > > > int parse_acpi_topology(void); > > > +void freq_inv_set_max_ratio(int cpu, u64 max_rate); > > > #endif > > > > > > #endif /* _LINUX_ARCH_TOPOLOGY_H_ */ > > > -- > > > 2.34.1 > > > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5845314006 for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 10:31:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=none Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43373112; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 03:31:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1803B2F4; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 03:31:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e129154.nice.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8044E3F67D; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 03:30:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 11:30:03 +0100 From: Beata Michalska To: Vincent Guittot Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, sudeep.holla@arm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, lenb@kernel.org, robert.moore@intel.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com, pierre.gondois@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, acpica-devel@lists.linuxfoundation.org, conor.dooley@microchip.com, suagrfillet@gmail.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com, lftan@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] arm64/amu: use capacity_ref_freq to set AMU ratio Message-ID: References: <20231027080400.56703-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <20231027080400.56703-8-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi Vincent, On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 10:04:27AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote: > Hi Beata, > > On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 at 00:59, Beata Michalska wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 10:04:00AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > > Use the new capacity_ref_freq to set the ratio that is used by AMU for > > > computing the arch_scale_freq_capacity(). > > > This helps to keep everything aligned using the same reference for > > > computing CPUs capacity. > > > > > [..] > > > > @@ -381,6 +385,9 @@ void topology_init_cpu_capacity_cppc(void) > > > } > > > > > > for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { > > > + freq_inv_set_max_ratio(cpu, > > > + per_cpu(capacity_ref_freq, cpu) * HZ_PER_KHZ); > > > + > > The capacity_ref_freq set earlier will still lead to units mismatch, > > as at the point of calling topology_init_cpu_capacity_cppc the lowest & nominal > > frequencies will be provided in MHz (unless I have missed smth). > > I don't get your point: > the unit of per_cpu(capacity_freq_ref, cpu) is Khz > > For cppc, we have > per_cpu(capacity_freq_ref, cpu) = cppc_perf_to_khz(&perf_caps, > raw_capacity[cpu]); > > freq_inv_set_max_ratio() uses > arch_timer_get_rate() which returns a freq in Hz > and > per_cpu(capacity_freq_ref, cpu) * HZ_PER_KHZ. to get a freq in Hz too. > Apologies, I should have been more verbose here. Before the change made in [1] the cppc_perf_to_khz was indeed operating on lowest & nominal frequency values expressed in kHZ, as those were appropriately amended: cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init |__> cppc_cpufreq_get_cpu_data: |__> ... /* Convert the lowest and nominal freq from MHz to KHz */ cpu_data->perf_caps.lowest_freq *= 1000; cpu_data->perf_caps.nominal_freq *= 1000; So far cppc_perf_to_khz (previously cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz) was being called with the post-processed CPC data (through cppc_cpufreq_get_cpu_data) and thus guaranteed to be operating on values in kHz. With the new changes the cppc_perf_to_khz will operate on raw CPC data, which are expressed in MHz.(as per acpi spec) --- Best Regards B. > > This means that use of both, the capacity_ref_freq and the arch_freq_scale > > will generate unexpected results, so I guess this should get amended in the > > preceding patch (?) [1] > > > > --- > > BR > > B. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20231027080400.56703-4-vincent.guittot@linaro.org/T/#m42daa167097edc190b1cfc05382c385ed801d909 > > > > > capacity = raw_capacity[cpu]; > > > capacity = div64_u64(capacity << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT, > > > capacity_scale); > > > @@ -422,8 +429,11 @@ init_cpu_capacity_callback(struct notifier_block *nb, > > > > > > cpumask_andnot(cpus_to_visit, cpus_to_visit, policy->related_cpus); > > > > > > - for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus) > > > + for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus) { > > > per_cpu(capacity_ref_freq, cpu) = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; > > > + freq_inv_set_max_ratio(cpu, > > > + per_cpu(capacity_ref_freq, cpu) * HZ_PER_KHZ); > > > + } > > > > > > if (cpumask_empty(cpus_to_visit)) { > > > topology_normalize_cpu_scale(); > > > diff --git a/include/linux/arch_topology.h b/include/linux/arch_topology.h > > > index 38ca6c76af56..ffdf0b7c55fa 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/arch_topology.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/arch_topology.h > > > @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpu); > > > void remove_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid); > > > void reset_cpu_topology(void); > > > int parse_acpi_topology(void); > > > +void freq_inv_set_max_ratio(int cpu, u64 max_rate); > > > #endif > > > > > > #endif /* _LINUX_ARCH_TOPOLOGY_H_ */ > > > -- > > > 2.34.1 > > > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42049C4332F for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 10:31:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=9VX8CwhXeURowgD0jmHl/CJZPHz61ZHlwpNgz48DgeE=; b=l4rgN2Ov63/Z2i mEsKiPjPJS2NRVV17dHMKwRkQRjtNowLzIvs+kWcMsFeS0sdpAhzXY0gXF/jxbwmeKO464e1Rm8cm yHxNHkNCdhh80GdzsElV4yTaWxFzMAB8WX4X1WsER29zsi9v2TJp0AkZSUuxFtDzsNk338zzy6LVf wulUKeVbgeqeb7ChD5eRKkve6PUm6pXVmjPO6Bg10YONhL/atahz+nAY3uPM+yQiiy0FYiGWqMeDR kidWhmqujzZc/qPZgEykQ3Lm6hUHA5wXPHScpAn6XmKfInflQi0oJaQB461/XukVuGF6xqi54a0kI 4OQIxt13i9qAkrUjbQrA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qyUyo-0097px-2T; Thu, 02 Nov 2023 10:31:14 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qyUyk-0097o9-0p; Thu, 02 Nov 2023 10:31:12 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1803B2F4; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 03:31:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e129154.nice.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8044E3F67D; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 03:30:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 11:30:03 +0100 From: Beata Michalska To: Vincent Guittot Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, sudeep.holla@arm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, lenb@kernel.org, robert.moore@intel.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com, pierre.gondois@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, acpica-devel@lists.linuxfoundation.org, conor.dooley@microchip.com, suagrfillet@gmail.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com, lftan@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] arm64/amu: use capacity_ref_freq to set AMU ratio Message-ID: References: <20231027080400.56703-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <20231027080400.56703-8-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20231102_033110_408197_BE59934F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 28.83 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Vincent, On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 10:04:27AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote: > Hi Beata, > > On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 at 00:59, Beata Michalska wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 10:04:00AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > > Use the new capacity_ref_freq to set the ratio that is used by AMU for > > > computing the arch_scale_freq_capacity(). > > > This helps to keep everything aligned using the same reference for > > > computing CPUs capacity. > > > > > [..] > > > > @@ -381,6 +385,9 @@ void topology_init_cpu_capacity_cppc(void) > > > } > > > > > > for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { > > > + freq_inv_set_max_ratio(cpu, > > > + per_cpu(capacity_ref_freq, cpu) * HZ_PER_KHZ); > > > + > > The capacity_ref_freq set earlier will still lead to units mismatch, > > as at the point of calling topology_init_cpu_capacity_cppc the lowest & nominal > > frequencies will be provided in MHz (unless I have missed smth). > > I don't get your point: > the unit of per_cpu(capacity_freq_ref, cpu) is Khz > > For cppc, we have > per_cpu(capacity_freq_ref, cpu) = cppc_perf_to_khz(&perf_caps, > raw_capacity[cpu]); > > freq_inv_set_max_ratio() uses > arch_timer_get_rate() which returns a freq in Hz > and > per_cpu(capacity_freq_ref, cpu) * HZ_PER_KHZ. to get a freq in Hz too. > Apologies, I should have been more verbose here. Before the change made in [1] the cppc_perf_to_khz was indeed operating on lowest & nominal frequency values expressed in kHZ, as those were appropriately amended: cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init |__> cppc_cpufreq_get_cpu_data: |__> ... /* Convert the lowest and nominal freq from MHz to KHz */ cpu_data->perf_caps.lowest_freq *= 1000; cpu_data->perf_caps.nominal_freq *= 1000; So far cppc_perf_to_khz (previously cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz) was being called with the post-processed CPC data (through cppc_cpufreq_get_cpu_data) and thus guaranteed to be operating on values in kHz. With the new changes the cppc_perf_to_khz will operate on raw CPC data, which are expressed in MHz.(as per acpi spec) --- Best Regards B. > > This means that use of both, the capacity_ref_freq and the arch_freq_scale > > will generate unexpected results, so I guess this should get amended in the > > preceding patch (?) [1] > > > > --- > > BR > > B. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20231027080400.56703-4-vincent.guittot@linaro.org/T/#m42daa167097edc190b1cfc05382c385ed801d909 > > > > > capacity = raw_capacity[cpu]; > > > capacity = div64_u64(capacity << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT, > > > capacity_scale); > > > @@ -422,8 +429,11 @@ init_cpu_capacity_callback(struct notifier_block *nb, > > > > > > cpumask_andnot(cpus_to_visit, cpus_to_visit, policy->related_cpus); > > > > > > - for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus) > > > + for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus) { > > > per_cpu(capacity_ref_freq, cpu) = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; > > > + freq_inv_set_max_ratio(cpu, > > > + per_cpu(capacity_ref_freq, cpu) * HZ_PER_KHZ); > > > + } > > > > > > if (cpumask_empty(cpus_to_visit)) { > > > topology_normalize_cpu_scale(); > > > diff --git a/include/linux/arch_topology.h b/include/linux/arch_topology.h > > > index 38ca6c76af56..ffdf0b7c55fa 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/arch_topology.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/arch_topology.h > > > @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpu); > > > void remove_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid); > > > void reset_cpu_topology(void); > > > int parse_acpi_topology(void); > > > +void freq_inv_set_max_ratio(int cpu, u64 max_rate); > > > #endif > > > > > > #endif /* _LINUX_ARCH_TOPOLOGY_H_ */ > > > -- > > > 2.34.1 > > > _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DFABC4332F for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 10:31:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=WOQwnW7w/7k2hd3BtCsVAKw88kxEq6CmpAttbw/3CFw=; b=nOX0xcfItJUxuq iqSOe0oeqlEI39bxBwUkumhkp6rZKgAFYVkQGWTtivFe9xMyxcRhicUcG2BqNBKaqLhvf+GWpBpJS SozDApDubLKzV3aqR2drXE2x+KuTLvEFHd97xo0EOS4GP53nUHh647Slv2AuTWA6uiTwq31z7BwwU Sp8yWkSgWhT0dN9101+UfQcRF0olV/VbFbSb4thGrXby2ZvKWwkL2BJjor5Xj8teDcJxe77dyKPdw eMvc2vHtUdk2pS3mtUbClRygIWPqC74jh20/d/aRHmA8SAJqetwkfovTYQRU5TAPnlrw8yl5Lyt5z b5ozfYUx+bTmsl4sc8Wg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qyUyn-0097pZ-0h; Thu, 02 Nov 2023 10:31:13 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qyUyk-0097o9-0p; Thu, 02 Nov 2023 10:31:12 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1803B2F4; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 03:31:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e129154.nice.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8044E3F67D; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 03:30:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 11:30:03 +0100 From: Beata Michalska To: Vincent Guittot Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, sudeep.holla@arm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, lenb@kernel.org, robert.moore@intel.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com, pierre.gondois@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, acpica-devel@lists.linuxfoundation.org, conor.dooley@microchip.com, suagrfillet@gmail.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com, lftan@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] arm64/amu: use capacity_ref_freq to set AMU ratio Message-ID: References: <20231027080400.56703-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <20231027080400.56703-8-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20231102_033110_408197_BE59934F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 28.83 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Vincent, On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 10:04:27AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote: > Hi Beata, > > On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 at 00:59, Beata Michalska wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 10:04:00AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > > Use the new capacity_ref_freq to set the ratio that is used by AMU for > > > computing the arch_scale_freq_capacity(). > > > This helps to keep everything aligned using the same reference for > > > computing CPUs capacity. > > > > > [..] > > > > @@ -381,6 +385,9 @@ void topology_init_cpu_capacity_cppc(void) > > > } > > > > > > for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { > > > + freq_inv_set_max_ratio(cpu, > > > + per_cpu(capacity_ref_freq, cpu) * HZ_PER_KHZ); > > > + > > The capacity_ref_freq set earlier will still lead to units mismatch, > > as at the point of calling topology_init_cpu_capacity_cppc the lowest & nominal > > frequencies will be provided in MHz (unless I have missed smth). > > I don't get your point: > the unit of per_cpu(capacity_freq_ref, cpu) is Khz > > For cppc, we have > per_cpu(capacity_freq_ref, cpu) = cppc_perf_to_khz(&perf_caps, > raw_capacity[cpu]); > > freq_inv_set_max_ratio() uses > arch_timer_get_rate() which returns a freq in Hz > and > per_cpu(capacity_freq_ref, cpu) * HZ_PER_KHZ. to get a freq in Hz too. > Apologies, I should have been more verbose here. Before the change made in [1] the cppc_perf_to_khz was indeed operating on lowest & nominal frequency values expressed in kHZ, as those were appropriately amended: cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init |__> cppc_cpufreq_get_cpu_data: |__> ... /* Convert the lowest and nominal freq from MHz to KHz */ cpu_data->perf_caps.lowest_freq *= 1000; cpu_data->perf_caps.nominal_freq *= 1000; So far cppc_perf_to_khz (previously cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz) was being called with the post-processed CPC data (through cppc_cpufreq_get_cpu_data) and thus guaranteed to be operating on values in kHz. With the new changes the cppc_perf_to_khz will operate on raw CPC data, which are expressed in MHz.(as per acpi spec) --- Best Regards B. > > This means that use of both, the capacity_ref_freq and the arch_freq_scale > > will generate unexpected results, so I guess this should get amended in the > > preceding patch (?) [1] > > > > --- > > BR > > B. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20231027080400.56703-4-vincent.guittot@linaro.org/T/#m42daa167097edc190b1cfc05382c385ed801d909 > > > > > capacity = raw_capacity[cpu]; > > > capacity = div64_u64(capacity << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT, > > > capacity_scale); > > > @@ -422,8 +429,11 @@ init_cpu_capacity_callback(struct notifier_block *nb, > > > > > > cpumask_andnot(cpus_to_visit, cpus_to_visit, policy->related_cpus); > > > > > > - for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus) > > > + for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus) { > > > per_cpu(capacity_ref_freq, cpu) = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; > > > + freq_inv_set_max_ratio(cpu, > > > + per_cpu(capacity_ref_freq, cpu) * HZ_PER_KHZ); > > > + } > > > > > > if (cpumask_empty(cpus_to_visit)) { > > > topology_normalize_cpu_scale(); > > > diff --git a/include/linux/arch_topology.h b/include/linux/arch_topology.h > > > index 38ca6c76af56..ffdf0b7c55fa 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/arch_topology.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/arch_topology.h > > > @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpu); > > > void remove_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid); > > > void reset_cpu_topology(void); > > > int parse_acpi_topology(void); > > > +void freq_inv_set_max_ratio(int cpu, u64 max_rate); > > > #endif > > > > > > #endif /* _LINUX_ARCH_TOPOLOGY_H_ */ > > > -- > > > 2.34.1 > > > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel