From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4148BC4167B for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2023 10:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229451AbjKCK46 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2023 06:56:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35884 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231712AbjKCK46 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2023 06:56:58 -0400 Received: from orbyte.nwl.cc (orbyte.nwl.cc [IPv6:2001:41d0:e:133a::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FF21D7 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2023 03:56:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n0-1 by orbyte.nwl.cc with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qyrrA-0000lF-OC; Fri, 03 Nov 2023 11:56:52 +0100 Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 11:56:52 +0100 From: Phil Sutter To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Cc: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez , Jeremy Sowden , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de Subject: Re: [RFC] nftables 1.0.6 -stable backports Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Phil Sutter , Pablo Neira Ayuso , Arturo Borrero Gonzalez , Jeremy Sowden , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 11:49:30AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 11:44:43AM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 10:59:25AM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > > [...] > > > One would have to change it to work based on *.y branches and the actual > > > commits in there. I'll give it a quick try, shouldn't be too hard > > > indeed. > > > > Please kindly find attached a "stable branch fork" of > > collect_backports.sh. I was too lazy to check its output for missing > > commits, but the ones it returns seem entirely valid. > > Would you mind to post the list of missing commits in 1.0.6.y? > > I am too lazy to run it. > eac68b84227a3fc46572f3bae1113eaa91d13f24 8519ab031d8022999603a69ee9f18e8cfb06645d 4e8aa050312822400124260bf6b630c3c05cb04d f65b2d12236174d477c55e96c4027cd51185ba5e 122dce6b35205a3df419a5cae9acfd6e83e8725a e4c9f9f7e0d1f83be18f6c4a418da503e9021b24 d392ddf243dcbf8a34726c777d2c669b1e8bfa85 Cheers, Phil