From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FF0415485 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2023 17:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="D4jm4Ghy" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1699809620; x=1731345620; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=A+ladAgLjDK1J5A68SWHTLVa+yDpBy9DjW3bmjnLS9Y=; b=D4jm4GhyqD1zVHbIx0SJbAyu1AK4SaXgvXtybwAeFgHGd/cbt2OCjJJo 4tOJXxbv/04hdQzH9pklIZOWmmhhmoPg3HbAMNtFmMf2MTqX1ekDDApar P7zF3pjcs/eaDnM3j7I6GW5YB8Q1sLdcoXpCdRdpWYsx9FrFxuaxqW85F zElyfgJGFee9krNCrGNHdCVY7xIdXaJU5VUlon4NuVmA0yoRy1Howipeq cqCMo3sNzQY5sUZ5OHq2Uh/Hx8SJmE08vS4wnzHNefAHKow+KGF5FCObg 1t1fT7s63d4wxztMY1dspvG1dzN3iUAORc6uRBEZLmoFOmjuwL2n31plR Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10892"; a="387504052" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,297,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="387504052" Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Nov 2023 09:20:19 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10892"; a="834538585" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,297,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="834538585" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 17d9e85e5079) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Nov 2023 09:20:18 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 17d9e85e5079 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1r2E88-000BMG-1m; Sun, 12 Nov 2023 17:20:16 +0000 Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 01:19:16 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Steven Rostedt Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [v6.6][PATCH] eventfs: Check for NULL ef in eventfs_set_attr() Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231112121817.2713c150@rorschach.local.home> Hi, Thanks for your patch. FYI: kernel test robot notices the stable kernel rule is not satisfied. The check is based on https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html#option-1 Rule: add the tag "Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org" in the sign-off area to have the patch automatically included in the stable tree. Subject: [v6.6][PATCH] eventfs: Check for NULL ef in eventfs_set_attr() Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20231112121817.2713c150%40rorschach.local.home -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki