From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcachefs: remove sb lock and flags update on explicit shutdown
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 08:43:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZWnjGOvxSLUfUos2@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231201020006.4i5gztfj6m2lr264@moria.home.lan>
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 09:00:06PM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 02:17:11PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> > bcachefs grabs s_umount and sets SB_RDONLY when the fs is shutdown
> > via the ioctl() interface. This has a couple issues related to
> > interactions between shutdown and freeze:
> >
> > 1. The flags == FSOP_GOING_FLAGS_DEFAULT case is a deadlock vector
> > because freeze_bdev() calls into freeze_super(), which also
> > acquires s_umount.
> >
> > 2. If an explicit shutdown occurs while the sb is frozen, SB_RDONLY
> > alters the thaw path as if the sb was read-only at freeze time.
> > This effectively leaks the frozen state and leaves the sb frozen
> > indefinitely.
> >
> > The usage of SB_RDONLY here goes back to the initial bcachefs commit
> > and AFAICT is simply historical behavior. This behavior is unique to
> > bcachefs relative to the handful of other filesystems that support
> > the shutdown ioctl(). Typically, SB_RDONLY is reserved for the
> > proper remount path, which itself is restricted from modifying
> > frozen superblocks in reconfigure_super(). Drop the unnecessary sb
> > lock and flags update bch2_ioc_goingdown() to address both of these
> > issues.
>
> Nice, I noticed a deadlock issue recently with s_umount here but didn't
> have time to fully debug it - applied!
>
Thanks!
Hmm.. got a reference to that observed deadlock handy? I'd be a little
cautious associating here because 1. I dont think any test tooling
currently uses the default shutdown mode for the ioctl and 2. the
non-ioctl emergency shutdown paths dont set SB_RDONLY, so shouldn't
trigger the freeze issue.
So IOW while this path was broken in the ways described in the commit
log, it still seems rather unlikely for a normal use or test case to
trigger this. It would be good to know if there's still a lingering
issue to resolve..
Brian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-01 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-30 19:17 [PATCH] bcachefs: remove sb lock and flags update on explicit shutdown Brian Foster
2023-12-01 2:00 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-12-01 13:43 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2023-12-02 0:38 ` Kent Overstreet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZWnjGOvxSLUfUos2@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.