All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Suppress old PLL pipe_mask checks for MG/TC/TBT PLLs
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 18:06:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZXHtjlRwLwmFmfwT@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZXHo9vrURBBdDuNx@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com>

On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 05:47:02PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 05:24:44PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 04:55:02PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 10:27:34AM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > > 
> > > > TC ports have both the MG/TC and TBT PLLs selected simultanously (so
> > > > that we can switch from MG/TC to TBT as a fallback). This doesn't play
> > > > well with the state checker that assumes that the old PLL shouldn't
> > > > have the pipe in its pipe_mask anymore. Suppress that check for these
> > > > PLLs to avoid spurious WARNs when you disconnect a TC port and a
> > > > non-disabling modeset happens before actually disabling the port.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Looks ok to me:
> > > Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > > 
> > > I suppose the check would be still valid for MG PLLs, but the port
> > > PLL stuff makes doing that cumbersome.
> > 
> > You mean for legacy ports?
> 
> Yes, I suppose in that case too, but in general the state check doesn't
> work only if the shared_dpll in either the the old or new crtc state is
> the TBT PLL and in the other state it's MG PLL. If the PLL in both
> states are MG PLL the state check would be still valid, if I didn't miss
> something.

Oh you mean switching from one MG PLL to another MG PLL?
Yeah, that in theory we'd still want to check.

Hmm. Maybe if we flag only the TBT PLL as special and
then skip the assert only when either the old or new PLL
is the TBT PLL?

> 
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 56 +++++++++++++------
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h |  4 ++
> > > >  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > > > index d86b02de2923..5c6c4fc50b1d 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > > > @@ -4023,11 +4023,16 @@ static const struct intel_shared_dpll_funcs mg_pll_funcs = {
> > > >  static const struct dpll_info icl_plls[] = {
> > > >  	{ .name = "DPLL 0", .funcs = &combo_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_DPLL0, },
> > > >  	{ .name = "DPLL 1", .funcs = &combo_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_DPLL1, },
> > > > -	{ .name = "TBT PLL", .funcs = &tbt_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_TBTPLL, },
> > > > -	{ .name = "MG PLL 1", .funcs = &mg_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL1, },
> > > > -	{ .name = "MG PLL 2", .funcs = &mg_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL2, },
> > > > -	{ .name = "MG PLL 3", .funcs = &mg_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL3, },
> > > > -	{ .name = "MG PLL 4", .funcs = &mg_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL4, },
> > > > +	{ .name = "TBT PLL", .funcs = &tbt_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_TBTPLL,
> > > > +	  .flags = INTEL_DPLL_HAS_ALT_PORT_DPLL, },
> > > > +	{ .name = "MG PLL 1", .funcs = &mg_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL1,
> > > > +	  .flags = INTEL_DPLL_HAS_ALT_PORT_DPLL, },
> > > > +	{ .name = "MG PLL 2", .funcs = &mg_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL2,
> > > > +	  .flags = INTEL_DPLL_HAS_ALT_PORT_DPLL, },
> > > > +	{ .name = "MG PLL 3", .funcs = &mg_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL3,
> > > > +	  .flags = INTEL_DPLL_HAS_ALT_PORT_DPLL, },
> > > > +	{ .name = "MG PLL 4", .funcs = &mg_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL4,
> > > > +	  .flags = INTEL_DPLL_HAS_ALT_PORT_DPLL, },
> > > >  	{}
> > > >  };
> > > >  
> > > > @@ -4068,13 +4073,20 @@ static const struct intel_shared_dpll_funcs dkl_pll_funcs = {
> > > >  static const struct dpll_info tgl_plls[] = {
> > > >  	{ .name = "DPLL 0", .funcs = &combo_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_DPLL0, },
> > > >  	{ .name = "DPLL 1", .funcs = &combo_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_DPLL1, },
> > > > -	{ .name = "TBT PLL", .funcs = &tbt_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_TBTPLL, },
> > > > -	{ .name = "TC PLL 1", .funcs = &dkl_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL1, },
> > > > -	{ .name = "TC PLL 2", .funcs = &dkl_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL2, },
> > > > -	{ .name = "TC PLL 3", .funcs = &dkl_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL3, },
> > > > -	{ .name = "TC PLL 4", .funcs = &dkl_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL4, },
> > > > -	{ .name = "TC PLL 5", .funcs = &dkl_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_TGL_MGPLL5, },
> > > > -	{ .name = "TC PLL 6", .funcs = &dkl_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_TGL_MGPLL6, },
> > > > +	{ .name = "TBT PLL", .funcs = &tbt_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_TBTPLL,
> > > > +	  .flags = INTEL_DPLL_HAS_ALT_PORT_DPLL, },
> > > > +	{ .name = "TC PLL 1", .funcs = &dkl_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL1,
> > > > +	  .flags = INTEL_DPLL_HAS_ALT_PORT_DPLL, },
> > > > +	{ .name = "TC PLL 2", .funcs = &dkl_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL2,
> > > > +	  .flags = INTEL_DPLL_HAS_ALT_PORT_DPLL, },
> > > > +	{ .name = "TC PLL 3", .funcs = &dkl_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL3,
> > > > +	  .flags = INTEL_DPLL_HAS_ALT_PORT_DPLL, },
> > > > +	{ .name = "TC PLL 4", .funcs = &dkl_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL4,
> > > > +	  .flags = INTEL_DPLL_HAS_ALT_PORT_DPLL, },
> > > > +	{ .name = "TC PLL 5", .funcs = &dkl_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_TGL_MGPLL5,
> > > > +	  .flags = INTEL_DPLL_HAS_ALT_PORT_DPLL, },
> > > > +	{ .name = "TC PLL 6", .funcs = &dkl_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_TGL_MGPLL6,
> > > > +	  .flags = INTEL_DPLL_HAS_ALT_PORT_DPLL, },
> > > >  	{}
> > > >  };
> > > >  
> > > > @@ -4141,11 +4153,16 @@ static const struct intel_dpll_mgr adls_pll_mgr = {
> > > >  static const struct dpll_info adlp_plls[] = {
> > > >  	{ .name = "DPLL 0", .funcs = &combo_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_DPLL0, },
> > > >  	{ .name = "DPLL 1", .funcs = &combo_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_DPLL1, },
> > > > -	{ .name = "TBT PLL", .funcs = &tbt_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_TBTPLL, },
> > > > -	{ .name = "TC PLL 1", .funcs = &dkl_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL1, },
> > > > -	{ .name = "TC PLL 2", .funcs = &dkl_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL2, },
> > > > -	{ .name = "TC PLL 3", .funcs = &dkl_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL3, },
> > > > -	{ .name = "TC PLL 4", .funcs = &dkl_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL4, },
> > > > +	{ .name = "TBT PLL", .funcs = &tbt_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_TBTPLL,
> > > > +	  .flags = INTEL_DPLL_HAS_ALT_PORT_DPLL, },
> > > > +	{ .name = "TC PLL 1", .funcs = &dkl_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL1,
> > > > +	  .flags = INTEL_DPLL_HAS_ALT_PORT_DPLL, },
> > > > +	{ .name = "TC PLL 2", .funcs = &dkl_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL2,
> > > > +	  .flags = INTEL_DPLL_HAS_ALT_PORT_DPLL, },
> > > > +	{ .name = "TC PLL 3", .funcs = &dkl_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL3,
> > > > +	  .flags = INTEL_DPLL_HAS_ALT_PORT_DPLL, },
> > > > +	{ .name = "TC PLL 4", .funcs = &dkl_pll_funcs, .id = DPLL_ID_ICL_MGPLL4,
> > > > +	  .flags = INTEL_DPLL_HAS_ALT_PORT_DPLL, },
> > > >  	{}
> > > >  };
> > > >  
> > > > @@ -4535,7 +4552,10 @@ void intel_shared_dpll_state_verify(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> > > >  		I915_STATE_WARN(i915, pll->active_mask & pipe_mask,
> > > >  				"%s: pll active mismatch (didn't expect pipe %c in active mask (0x%x))\n",
> > > >  				pll->info->name, pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->active_mask);
> > > > -		I915_STATE_WARN(i915, pll->state.pipe_mask & pipe_mask,
> > > > +
> > > > +		/* TC ports have both MG/TC and TBT PLL referenced simultaneously */
> > > > +		I915_STATE_WARN(i915, !(pll->info->flags & INTEL_DPLL_HAS_ALT_PORT_DPLL) &&
> > > > +				pll->state.pipe_mask & pipe_mask,
> > > >  				"%s: pll enabled crtcs mismatch (found pipe %c in enabled mask (0x%x))\n",
> > > >  				pll->info->name, pipe_name(crtc->pipe), pll->state.pipe_mask);
> > > >  	}
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> > > > index 2e7ea0d8d3ff..594658087b4a 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> > > > @@ -277,12 +277,16 @@ struct dpll_info {
> > > >  	enum intel_display_power_domain power_domain;
> > > >  
> > > >  #define INTEL_DPLL_ALWAYS_ON	(1 << 0)
> > > > +#define INTEL_DPLL_HAS_ALT_PORT_DPLL	(1 << 1)
> > > >  	/**
> > > >  	 * @flags:
> > > >  	 *
> > > >  	 * INTEL_DPLL_ALWAYS_ON
> > > >  	 *     Inform the state checker that the DPLL is kept enabled even if
> > > >  	 *     not in use by any CRTC.
> > > > +	 * INTEL_DPLL_HAS_ALT_PORT_DPLL
> > > > +	 *     Inform the state checker that the CRTC will have two port DPLLs
> > > > +	 *     referenced simultanously (for TC->TBT fallback).
> > > >  	 */
> > > >  	u32 flags;
> > > >  };
> > > > -- 
> > > > 2.41.0
> > > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-07 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-24  8:27 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/psr: Include some basic PSR information in the state dump Ville Syrjala
2023-11-24  8:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Replace a memset() with zero initialization Ville Syrjala
2023-11-29 14:50   ` Kahola, Mika
2023-11-24  8:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Include the PLL name in the debug messages Ville Syrjala
2023-11-24  8:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Suppress old PLL pipe_mask checks for MG/TC/TBT PLLs Ville Syrjala
2023-12-07 14:05   ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-12-07 14:55   ` [Intel-gfx] " Imre Deak
2023-12-07 15:24     ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-12-07 15:47       ` Imre Deak
2023-12-07 16:06         ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2023-12-07 16:15           ` Imre Deak
2023-11-24  8:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Convert PLL flags to booleans Ville Syrjala
2023-11-24  8:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/psr: Include some basic PSR information in the state dump Hogander, Jouni
2023-11-24 16:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/5] " Patchwork
2023-11-24 16:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-11-28 22:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/5] drm/i915/psr: Include some basic PSR information in the state dump (rev2) Patchwork
2023-11-28 22:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-11-29  4:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZXHtjlRwLwmFmfwT@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.