All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
Cc: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>,
	intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Change the name of frequency sysfs attributes
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 23:47:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZXKf0yVaESLeQ3eB@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <046df246-d29f-4551-9df0-fcf8aa4502a9@intel.com>

On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 11:04:04AM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
> Hi Rodrigo/Suja
> 
> These changes are removed again in the second patch.

What? they are not. The final result is something_freq.

The next patch is based on this.

> Is this patch required?

and both are required if we want to be prepared for a
possible alignment with devfreq.

> 
> Thanks
> Riana
> 
> On 12/6/2023 3:06 AM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > From: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
> > 
> > Switching the names of frequency sysfs attrbutes to align with
> > required devfreq changes. The name changes are as below;
> > 
> > -freq_act -> act_freq
> > -freq_cur -> cur_freq
> > -freq_rpn -> rpn_freq
> > -freq_rpe -> rpe_freq
> > -freq_rp0 -> rp0_freq
> > -freq_min -> min_freq
> > -freq_max -> max_freq
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
> >   1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> > index d2605a684b1c..b1876fbea669 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
> > @@ -60,15 +60,15 @@
> >    * Xe's GuC PC provides a sysfs API for frequency management:
> >    *
> >    * device/gt#/freq_* *read-only* files:
> > - * - freq_act: The actual resolved frequency decided by PCODE.
> > - * - freq_cur: The current one requested by GuC PC to the Hardware.
> > - * - freq_rpn: The Render Performance (RP) N level, which is the minimal one.
> > - * - freq_rpe: The Render Performance (RP) E level, which is the efficient one.
> > - * - freq_rp0: The Render Performance (RP) 0 level, which is the maximum one.
> > + * - act_freq: The actual resolved frequency decided by PCODE.
> > + * - cur_freq: The current one requested by GuC PC to the Hardware.
> > + * - rpn_freq: The Render Performance (RP) N level, which is the minimal one.
> > + * - rpe_freq: The Render Performance (RP) E level, which is the efficient one.
> > + * - rp0_freq: The Render Performance (RP) 0 level, which is the maximum one.
> >    *
> >    * device/gt#/freq_* *read-write* files:
> > - * - freq_min: GuC PC min request.
> > - * - freq_max: GuC PC max request.
> > + * - min_freq: GuC PC min request.
> > + * - max_freq: GuC PC max request.
> >    *             If max <= min, then freq_min becomes a fixed frequency request.
> >    *
> >    * Render-C States:
> > @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static void pc_update_rp_values(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> >   	pc->rpn_freq = min(pc->rpn_freq, pc->rpe_freq);
> >   }
> > -static ssize_t freq_act_show(struct device *dev,
> > +static ssize_t act_freq_show(struct device *dev,
> >   			     struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> >   {
> >   	struct kobject *kobj = &dev->kobj;
> > @@ -413,9 +413,9 @@ static ssize_t freq_act_show(struct device *dev,
> >   	xe_device_mem_access_put(gt_to_xe(gt));
> >   	return ret;
> >   }
> > -static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(freq_act);
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(act_freq);
> > -static ssize_t freq_cur_show(struct device *dev,
> > +static ssize_t cur_freq_show(struct device *dev,
> >   			     struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> >   {
> >   	struct kobject *kobj = &dev->kobj;
> > @@ -442,18 +442,18 @@ static ssize_t freq_cur_show(struct device *dev,
> >   	xe_device_mem_access_put(gt_to_xe(gt));
> >   	return ret;
> >   }
> > -static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(freq_cur);
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(cur_freq);
> > -static ssize_t freq_rp0_show(struct device *dev,
> > +static ssize_t rp0_freq_show(struct device *dev,
> >   			     struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> >   {
> >   	struct xe_guc_pc *pc = dev_to_pc(dev);
> >   	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", pc->rp0_freq);
> >   }
> > -static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(freq_rp0);
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(rp0_freq);
> > -static ssize_t freq_rpe_show(struct device *dev,
> > +static ssize_t rpe_freq_show(struct device *dev,
> >   			     struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> >   {
> >   	struct xe_guc_pc *pc = dev_to_pc(dev);
> > @@ -465,18 +465,18 @@ static ssize_t freq_rpe_show(struct device *dev,
> >   	xe_device_mem_access_put(xe);
> >   	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", pc->rpe_freq);
> >   }
> > -static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(freq_rpe);
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(rpe_freq);
> > -static ssize_t freq_rpn_show(struct device *dev,
> > +static ssize_t rpn_freq_show(struct device *dev,
> >   			     struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> >   {
> >   	struct xe_guc_pc *pc = dev_to_pc(dev);
> >   	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", pc->rpn_freq);
> >   }
> > -static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(freq_rpn);
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(rpn_freq);
> > -static ssize_t freq_min_show(struct device *dev,
> > +static ssize_t min_freq_show(struct device *dev,
> >   			     struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> >   {
> >   	struct xe_guc_pc *pc = dev_to_pc(dev);
> > @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ static ssize_t freq_min_show(struct device *dev,
> >   	return ret;
> >   }
> > -static ssize_t freq_min_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> > +static ssize_t min_freq_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> >   			      const char *buff, size_t count)
> >   {
> >   	struct xe_guc_pc *pc = dev_to_pc(dev);
> > @@ -543,9 +543,9 @@ static ssize_t freq_min_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> >   	xe_device_mem_access_put(pc_to_xe(pc));
> >   	return ret ?: count;
> >   }
> > -static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(freq_min);
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(min_freq);
> > -static ssize_t freq_max_show(struct device *dev,
> > +static ssize_t max_freq_show(struct device *dev,
> >   			     struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> >   {
> >   	struct xe_guc_pc *pc = dev_to_pc(dev);
> > @@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ static ssize_t freq_max_show(struct device *dev,
> >   	return ret;
> >   }
> > -static ssize_t freq_max_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> > +static ssize_t max_freq_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> >   			      const char *buff, size_t count)
> >   {
> >   	struct xe_guc_pc *pc = dev_to_pc(dev);
> > @@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ static ssize_t freq_max_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> >   	xe_device_mem_access_put(pc_to_xe(pc));
> >   	return ret ?: count;
> >   }
> > -static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(freq_max);
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(max_freq);
> >   /**
> >    * xe_guc_pc_c_status - get the current GT C state
> > @@ -667,13 +667,13 @@ u64 xe_guc_pc_mc6_residency(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
> >   }
> >   static const struct attribute *pc_attrs[] = {
> > -	&dev_attr_freq_act.attr,
> > -	&dev_attr_freq_cur.attr,
> > -	&dev_attr_freq_rp0.attr,
> > -	&dev_attr_freq_rpe.attr,
> > -	&dev_attr_freq_rpn.attr,
> > -	&dev_attr_freq_min.attr,
> > -	&dev_attr_freq_max.attr,
> > +	&dev_attr_act_freq.attr,
> > +	&dev_attr_cur_freq.attr,
> > +	&dev_attr_rp0_freq.attr,
> > +	&dev_attr_rpe_freq.attr,
> > +	&dev_attr_rpn_freq.attr,
> > +	&dev_attr_min_freq.attr,
> > +	&dev_attr_max_freq.attr,
> >   	NULL
> >   };

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-08  4:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-05 21:36 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe: Change the name of frequency sysfs attributes Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-05 21:36 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Create a xe_gt_freq component for raw management and sysfs Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-06 23:52   ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2023-12-07  5:23   ` Riana Tauro
2023-12-05 21:36 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Add frequency throttle reasons sysfs attributes Rodrigo Vivi
2023-12-07  5:14   ` Riana Tauro
2023-12-07  5:23     ` Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2023-12-07  5:29       ` Riana Tauro
2023-12-06  3:23 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/xe: Change the name of frequency " Patchwork
2023-12-06  3:23 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-12-06  3:24 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-12-06  3:32 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-12-06  3:32 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2023-12-06  3:33 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2023-12-06  4:10 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-12-07  5:34 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 1/3] " Riana Tauro
2023-12-08  4:47   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-12-08  5:15     ` Riana Tauro
2023-12-08  5:29       ` Rodrigo Vivi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZXKf0yVaESLeQ3eB@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
    --cc=sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.