All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
To: Mark Hills <mark@xwax.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Regression in Final Scratch 'ScratchAmp' quirk (DJ interface)
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 20:53:40 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZZXzhKbCEK04caa2@geday> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05f7b47d-1762-c6aa-ddb1-3c6f6128cf44@xwax.org>

On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 03:54:29PM +0000, Mark Hills wrote:
> The ScratchAmp worked perfectly with a quirk, but now that seems to have 
> regressed and the device is no longer detected [1].
> 
> It's design is from 2002, based on class-compliant (Philips UDA1325H) 
> chips. It hides itself behind a 'vendor specific' description, presumably 
> as it was launched in a closed system with specific hardware and software 
> for DJ'ing.

Hi Mark, great fan of your work with xwax here.

Perhaps adding USB_DEVICE_VENDOR_SPEC(0x103d, 0x0100) and
USB_DEVICE_VENDOR_SPEC(0x103d, 0x0101) to quirks-table.h can do the
trick?

Regards,
Geraldo Nascimento

> 
> So this quirk was introduced in 2007:
> 
> +/* Stanton/N2IT Final Scratch v1 device ('Scratchamp') */
> +{
> +	USB_DEVICE(0x103d, 0x0100),
> +		.driver_info = (unsigned long) & (const struct snd_usb_audio_quirk) {
> +		.vendor_name = "Stanton",
> +		.product_name = "ScratchAmp",
> +		.ifnum = QUIRK_NO_INTERFACE
> +	}
> +},
> +{
> +	USB_DEVICE(0x103d, 0x0101),
> +		.driver_info = (unsigned long) & (const struct snd_usb_audio_quirk) {
> +		.vendor_name = "Stanton",
> +		.product_name = "ScratchAmp",
> +		.ifnum = QUIRK_NO_INTERFACE
> +	}
> +},
> 
> In a modern kernel, the (ineffective) quirk is now in sound/usb/card.c:
> 
> +	/* Stanton/N2IT Final Scratch v1 device ('Scratchamp') */
> +	DEVICE_NAME(0x103d, 0x0100, "Stanton", "ScratchAmp"),
> +	DEVICE_NAME(0x103d, 0x0101, "Stanton", "ScratchAmp"),
> 
> Is there a functional difference between these quirks and/or any reason 
> the device would no longer be detected?
> 
> I noted the commits went via use of QUIRK_RENAME_DEVICE(), perhaps 
> misleading the refactoring to assume the quirk was purely a rename.
> 
> Below is an "lsusb" of the device, dated from 2008; I don't currently have 
> access to my own device, or know exactly when this regressed.
> 
> Many thanks
> 
> [1] https://sourceforge.net/p/xwax/mailman/message/48496984/
> [2] http://www.pogo.org.uk/~mark/linuxdj/scratchamp.html
> [3] https://finalscratch.sourceforge.net/innards/
> 
> -- 
> Mark

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-03 23:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-03 15:54 Regression in Final Scratch 'ScratchAmp' quirk (DJ interface) Mark Hills
2024-01-03 23:53 ` Geraldo Nascimento [this message]
2024-01-04  9:42   ` Takashi Iwai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZZXzhKbCEK04caa2@geday \
    --to=geraldogabriel@gmail.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=mark@xwax.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.