From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] ublk: don't try to stop disk if ->ub_disk is NULL
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 09:32:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_23OxWATqNr1fcy@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z/1lr233+THpllVI@dev-ushankar.dev.purestorage.com>
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 01:44:47PM -0600, Uday Shankar wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 07:25:42PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > In ublk_stop_dev(), if ublk device state becomes UBLK_S_DEV_DEAD, we
> > will return immediately. This way is correct, but not enough, because
> > ublk device may transition to other state, such UBLK_S_DEV_QUIECED,
> > when it may have been stopped already. Then kernel panic is triggered.
>
> How can this happen? If a device is stopped, it is in the
> UBLK_S_DEV_DEAD state. Won't that make us fall out of this check in
> ublk_nosrv_work, so we wont transition to UBLK_S_DEV_QUIESCED or other
> nosrv states?
>
> mutex_lock(&ub->mutex);
> if (ub->dev_info.state != UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE)
> goto unlock;
You are right.
I just verified that all tests can pass after reverting this patch.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-15 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-14 11:25 [PATCH 0/9] ublk: simplify & improve IO canceling Ming Lei
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 1/9] ublk: don't try to stop disk if ->ub_disk is NULL Ming Lei
2025-04-14 19:44 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-15 1:32 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 2/9] ublk: properly serialize all FETCH_REQs Ming Lei
2025-04-14 19:58 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-14 20:39 ` Jens Axboe
2025-04-14 20:52 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-14 21:00 ` Jens Axboe
2025-04-15 1:40 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-16 1:13 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-16 1:17 ` Jens Axboe
2025-04-16 2:04 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-16 1:04 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 3/9] ublk: add ublk_force_abort_dev() Ming Lei
2025-04-14 20:06 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 4/9] ublk: rely on ->canceling for dealing with ublk_nosrv_dev_should_queue_io Ming Lei
2025-04-14 20:15 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-15 1:48 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 5/9] ublk: move device reset into ublk_ch_release() Ming Lei
2025-04-14 20:29 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-15 1:50 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 6/9] ublk: improve detection and handling of ublk server exit Ming Lei
2025-04-14 20:36 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-15 1:54 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 7/9] ublk: remove __ublk_quiesce_dev() Ming Lei
2025-04-14 20:37 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 8/9] ublk: simplify aborting ublk request Ming Lei
2025-04-14 20:42 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 9/9] selftests: ublk: add generic_06 for covering fault inject Ming Lei
2025-04-14 20:44 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-15 1:57 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z_23OxWATqNr1fcy@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.