All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Sauerwein, David" <dssauerw@amazon.de>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] mm: Optimise SPARSEMEM implementation of for_each_valid_pfn()
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 10:07:18 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_N5ps86xJmewe_P@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250404155959.3442111-4-dwmw2@infradead.org>

On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 04:59:56PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
> 
> There's no point in checking the section and subsection bitmap for *every*
> PFN in the same section; they're either all valid or they aren't.

Don't you want to merge this with the previous commit?
 
> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
> ---
>  include/linux/mmzone.h | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index 67cdf675a4b9..0da1b0ba5d9f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -2154,21 +2154,20 @@ static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static inline bool first_valid_pfn(unsigned long *p_pfn)
> +/* Returns -1 (an invalid PFN) if no valid PFN remaining */
> +static inline unsigned long first_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
>  {
> -	unsigned long pfn = *p_pfn;
>  	unsigned long nr = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn);
>  
>  	rcu_read_lock_sched();
>  
> -	while (nr <= __highest_present_section_nr) {
> +	while (nr <= __highest_present_section_nr && pfn < end_pfn) {
>  		struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
>  
>  		if (valid_section(ms) &&
>  		    (early_section(ms) || pfn_section_first_valid(ms, &pfn))) {
> -			*p_pfn = pfn;
>  			rcu_read_unlock_sched();
> -			return true;
> +			return pfn;
>  		}
>  
>  		/* Nothing left in this section? Skip to next section */
> @@ -2177,14 +2176,34 @@ static inline bool first_valid_pfn(unsigned long *p_pfn)
>  	}
>  
>  	rcu_read_unlock_sched();
> +	return (unsigned long)-1;
> +}
>  
> -	return false;
> +static inline unsigned long next_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> +{
> +	pfn++;
> +
> +	if (pfn >= end_pfn)
> +		return (unsigned long)-1;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Either every PFN within the section (or subsection for VMEMMAP) is
> +	 * valid, or none of them are. So there's no point repeating the check
> +	 * for every PFN; only call first_valid_pfn() the first time, and when
> +	 * crossing a (sub)section boundary (i.e. !(pfn & ~PFN_VALID_MASK)).
> +	 */
> +	if (pfn & (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) ?
> +		   PAGE_SUBSECTION_MASK : PAGE_SECTION_MASK))
> +		return pfn;
> +
> +	return first_valid_pfn(pfn, end_pfn);
>  }
>  
> -#define for_each_valid_pfn(_pfn, _start_pfn, _end_pfn)	       \
> -	for ((_pfn) = (_start_pfn);			       \
> -	     first_valid_pfn(&(_pfn)) && (_pfn) < (_end_pfn);  \
> -	     (_pfn)++)
> +
> +#define for_each_valid_pfn(_pfn, _start_pfn, _end_pfn)			\
> +	for ((_pfn) = first_valid_pfn((_start_pfn), (_end_pfn));	\
> +	     (_pfn) != (unsigned long)-1;				\
> +	     (_pfn) = next_valid_pfn((_pfn), (_end_pfn)))
>  
>  #endif
>  
> -- 
> 2.49.0
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-07  7:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-04 15:59 [RFC PATCH v2 1/7] mm: Introduce for_each_valid_pfn() and use it from reserve_bootmem_region() David Woodhouse
2025-04-04 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/7] mm: Implement for_each_valid_pfn() for CONFIG_FLATMEM David Woodhouse
2025-04-07  6:54   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-07  7:56     ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-04 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/7] mm: Implement for_each_valid_pfn() for CONFIG_SPARSEMEM David Woodhouse
2025-04-04 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] mm: Optimise SPARSEMEM implementation of for_each_valid_pfn() David Woodhouse
2025-04-07  7:07   ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2025-04-07  8:01     ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-04 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/7] mm, PM: Use for_each_valid_pfn() in kernel/power/snapshot.c David Woodhouse
2025-04-04 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/7] mm, x86: Use for_each_valid_pfn() from __ioremap_check_ram() David Woodhouse
2025-04-04 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/7] mm: use for_each_valid_pfn() in memory_hotplug David Woodhouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z_N5ps86xJmewe_P@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dssauerw@amazon.de \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.