From: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/20] iio: introduced iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts() that takes a data_total_len argument.
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 12:18:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_OYWKli6qVPgW2_@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250406172001.2167607-6-jic23@kernel.org>
On Sun, Apr 06, 2025 at 06:19:46PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
>
> Check that data_total_len argument against iio_dev->scan_bytes.
>
> The size needs to be at least as big as the scan. It can be larger,
> which is typical if only part of fixed sized storage is used due to
> a subset of channels being enabled.
...
> +static inline int iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + void *data, size_t data_total_len,
> + int64_t timestamp)
Do we still need to inherit int64_t type? Can't it be s64 instead?
> +{
> + if (unlikely(data_total_len < indio_dev->scan_bytes)) {
> + dev_err(&indio_dev->dev,
> + "Undersized storage pushed to buffer\n");
One line, even for the fanatics of 80.
> + return -ENOSPC;
> + }
> +
> + return iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, data, timestamp);
> +}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-07 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-06 17:19 [PATCH v2 00/20] IIO: Introduce iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts() taking an input buffer length argument Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-06 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] iio: adc: ad7266: Fix potential timestamp alignment issue Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-07 9:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07 16:23 ` Nuno Sá
2025-04-06 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 02/20] iio: adc: ad7768-1: Fix insufficient alignment of timestamp Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-07 9:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07 16:23 ` Nuno Sá
2025-04-06 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 03/20] iio: adc: dln2: Use aligned_s64 for timestamp Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-07 9:11 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-06 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 04/20] iio: accel: adxl355: Make timestamp 64 bit aligned using aligned_s64 Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-07 9:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07 16:24 ` Nuno Sá
2025-04-06 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 05/20] iio: introduced iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts() that takes a data_total_len argument Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-07 9:18 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-04-13 9:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-07 16:25 ` Nuno Sá
2025-04-06 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 06/20] iio: dummy: Use a fixed structure to build up scan to push to buffers Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-07 9:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07 16:34 ` Nuno Sá
2025-04-13 10:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-07 16:34 ` Nuno Sá
2025-04-13 10:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-06 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 07/20] iio: dummy: Switch to iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts() and provide size of storage Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-07 9:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07 16:37 ` Nuno Sá
2025-04-06 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 08/20] iio: adc: ti-ads131e08: Use new iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts() to provide length sanity check Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-07 9:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-06 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 09/20] iio: adc: Use iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts() to provide length for runtime checks Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-07 9:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-13 10:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-06 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 10/20] iio: accel: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-07 9:33 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-06 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 11/20] iio: accel: hid: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-06 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 12/20] iio: chemical: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-06 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 13/20] iio: temp: maxim-thermocouple: Fix potential lack of DMA safe buffer Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-06 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 14/20] iio: temperature: Use iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts() to provide length for runtime checks Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-06 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 15/20] iio: resolver: " Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-06 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 16/20] iio: proximity: irsd200: Use a struct for scan and iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts() Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-06 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 17/20] iio: proximity: Use iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts() to provide length for runtime checks Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-06 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 18/20] iio: pressure: zpa2326: Use aligned_s64 for the timestamp Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-06 17:20 ` [PATCH v2 19/20] iio: pressure: Use iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts() to provide length for runtime checks Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-07 11:27 ` Matti Vaittinen
2025-04-06 17:20 ` [PATCH v2 20/20] iio: magnetometer: " Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z_OYWKli6qVPgW2_@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.