From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58ADF158DD8 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2025 16:41:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744130515; cv=none; b=SMgbGO7JDyRnvIQRcZhIcrVbrViGbY2kFCVdY3YY7GGnGroGT/ebl6npjL26cRmOG/ywbntJs4Xa2iqVt0K0qL1aFEwirCINKtPek0gqNJ8v9kdgk9F8q49CkyNcTxY1kP+mkRVB5+oV1J/mJd32i3LLSy8qcHR1XVC35/g2KLw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744130515; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4op9jNhu1JrYinf6lyrrAvndTpJ+bMmeXtUhZ5RQAyw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=q3XSO5mI78pdTy+bvMCqL//qoshTD0eb+egGpH+bNTvF1fLPauC0jc5COJZ/Uq11jprm+/LNx2eMQoeFZEYQm6K9AY3sicmarAuhnigZRyBQ+j3YP4oU36efcREO6wzx0wyWT+nWnzXYiEFKYpHkliaS0qAMe8z7c9ZtmWzNwd0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=kTBq7tk2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="kTBq7tk2" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=vvGkU4gEgFwDt2sKMqjCOFpYd9TI16NHGHC2HMBpO4M=; b=kTBq7tk2eHSmviBufhNL52rJji durQxeQIaRA6HHOVppjTWPWP4qgdyGfRdpfq128YPdZtp6dD+KPdSqsbndxwR44U5YQ7ouPclXuY3 056JcWJhIcIsF7lHOdpq0wD8i3HghcqoOUBPMTK2q2+z12zTPes00P5J7o/1k/x5ncKwnAXFHYvs5 YVbOxpjwx1iPFgmjZ/vK8Rn7fVNMENXUaJQBw4mdtewtGMZ55oEmNKUfQ7eltR/NXTYXDkyh4AVpi D75SGXYOs5aj9oxow0TGHQFFEUm44R4qW8U26aOKzKg00kjBaq8Ul0hoOKaGfl0vVLRRmEboDM38s BiiwHWaw==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1u2C15-0000000GykQ-3lqL; Tue, 08 Apr 2025 16:41:39 +0000 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 17:41:39 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Moumal Al-Saady Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, "Kirill A. Shutemov" , x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: X86_64: Obsolete 5 level paging config flag documentation Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Adding Kirill, linux-mm and the x86 maintainers. On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 04:43:29PM +0300, Moumal Al-Saady wrote: > Hello, > I was wondering if 29.3.2 > (https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/arch/x86/x86_64/5level-paging.html#enabling-5-level-paging) > should remain in the documentation, considering that from 21st of June > (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240621164406.256314-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com/), > the config flag was removed, and unconditional 5 level paging support > was put in (https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-Unconditional-5-Level-x86). > > First post, followed the FAQ, guides, please lmk if any improvements > to communication can be made. Additionally couldn't find in the > MAINTAINERS file, the maintainer for 5level_paging.rst, so directed > here. > Thanks, >