From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@kernel.org>
To: Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@linaro.org>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
trini@konsulko.com, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: dts: Add override for RB1
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 18:05:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_ZpeSFEyJan2mZB@sumit-X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <deb7ccd0-978b-4b97-bf67-de540dc02fe6@linaro.org>
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 04:43:49PM +0200, Caleb Connolly wrote:
>
>
> On 4/8/25 15:46, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 02:17:29PM +0200, Caleb Connolly wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/7/25 15:28, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > > From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > > >
> > > > Add U-Boot override for RB1 to for USB in host mode as OTG mode isn't
> > > > supported. Also, disable sdhc_2 as it's currently not supported, sdhc_1
> > > > works fine though.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/arm/dts/qrb2210-rb1-u-boot.dtsi | 11 +++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/qrb2210-rb1-u-boot.dtsi
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/qrb2210-rb1-u-boot.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/qrb2210-rb1-u-boot.dtsi
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 00000000000..1e136ee405a
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/dts/qrb2210-rb1-u-boot.dtsi
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > > +
> > > > +/* This is usually OTG but U-Boot doesn't support that properly */
> > > > +&usb_dwc3 {
> > > > + dr_mode = "host";
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +/* SDHC_2 isn't supported in U-Boot as of now */
> > >
> > > I'd rather avoid disabling this here, I guess it's just missing clocks and
> > > regulators which doesn't justify modifying DT. An error that mmc1 couldn't
> > > be enabled seems fine to me?
> >
> > I totally echo with your thinking that we should avoid modifying DT but
> > at the same point we shouldn't enable peripherals in U-Boot which throws
> > errors. It's also possible that U-Boot misconfiguring mmc1 which might
>
> I disagree, DT isn't enabling or disabling peripherals, it's describing
> hardware.
It would be helpful if you can describe the use-case for "status"
property then.
> U-Boot lacking proper support for that hardware isn't a good
> justification to disable it. Especially since you might boot Linux with the
> same DT and now have no working sdcard for seemingly no reason.
We shouldn't use same DT unless both U-Boot and Linux support that
without modifications and *not* being in a broken state. The similar argument
holds true for USB OTG mode too.
>
> An error in U-Boot is exactly the behaviour we want to see, masking it only
> created confusion.> turn as a problem for later stages.
IMO, our first priority should be to fix U-Boot issues and then see if
we can use unmodified DT.
> >
> > I have been totally working with a remote lab to fix issues on RB1. I
> > will soon get one on my desk then I will be able to fix mmc1 too.
>
> In that case we can surely land the proper fixes for 2025.07 anyway, so I'd
> just keep the errors until then.
Fixing errors in mainline will help other people confidence who are
trying to boot U-Boot on RB1. If you still have a strong preference to
keep SD card support enabled in broken state then I can live with that
until I fix it for real.
-Sumit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-09 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-07 13:28 [PATCH 0/2] RB1 fixes Sumit Garg
2025-04-07 13:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm: dts: Add override for RB1 Sumit Garg
2025-04-08 12:17 ` Caleb Connolly
2025-04-08 13:46 ` Sumit Garg
2025-04-08 14:43 ` Caleb Connolly
2025-04-09 12:35 ` Sumit Garg [this message]
2025-04-09 17:23 ` Caleb Connolly
2025-04-10 8:11 ` Sumit Garg
2025-04-07 13:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] qcom_defconfig: Disable MMC HS200 mode support Sumit Garg
2025-04-07 14:30 ` Caleb Connolly
2025-04-08 4:29 ` Sumit Garg
2025-04-08 12:13 ` Caleb Connolly
2025-04-09 12:36 ` Sumit Garg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-04-07 13:21 [PATCH 0/2] RB1 fixes Sumit Garg
2025-04-07 13:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm: dts: Add override for RB1 Sumit Garg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z_ZpeSFEyJan2mZB@sumit-X1 \
--to=sumit.garg@kernel.org \
--cc=caleb.connolly@linaro.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=sumit.garg@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.