From: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Dan Scally" <djrscally@gmail.com>,
"Alan Stern" <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
"Sakari Ailus" <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
"Hao Yao" <hao.yao@intel.com>,
"Bingbu Cao" <bingbu.cao@intel.com>, Duane <duanek@chorus.net>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] platform/x86: int3472: Add handshake pin support
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 21:16:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z__z_G21Ro2jGDkP@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250416124037.90508-9-hdegoede@redhat.com>
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 02:40:36PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> New Intel Meteor Lake based laptops with IPU6 cameras have a new type 0x12
> pin defined in the INT3472 sensor companion device which describes
> the sensor's GPIOs.
>
> This pin is primarily used on designs with a Lattice FPGA chip which is
> capable of running the sensor independently of the main CPU for features
> like presence detection. This pin needs to be driven high to make the FPGA
> run the power-on sequence of the sensor. After driving the pin high,
> the FPGA "firmware" needs 25ms to complete the power-on sequence.
>
> Add support for this modelling the handshake pin as a GPIO driven "dvdd"
> regulator with a 25 ms enable time. This model was chosen because:
>
> 1. Sensor chips don't have a handshake pin, so we need to abstract this
> in some way which does not require modification to the sensor drivers,
> sensor drivers using the bulk-regulator API to get avdd + vddio + dvdd
> is normal. So this will work to get the right value set to the handshake
> pin without requiring sensor driver modifications.
>
> 2. Sensors typically wait only a small time for the sensor to power-on
> after de-asserting reset. Not the 25ms the Lattice chip requires.
> Using the regulator framework's enable_time allows hiding the need for
> this delay from the sensor drivers.
...
> if (ret)
> err_msg = "Failed to map regulator to sensor\n";
>
> + break;
> + if (ret)
> + err_msg = "Failed to map regulator to sensor\n";
> +
> break;
As discussed this might be changed to have the same format string with supplied
name as a parameter.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-16 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-16 12:40 [PATCH v3 0/9] platform/x86: int3472: Add handshake pin support Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] platform/x86: int3472: Add skl_int3472_register_clock() helper Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] platform/x86: int3472: Stop setting a supply-name for GPIO regulators Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] platform/x86: int3472: Drop unused gpio field from struct int3472_gpio_regulator Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] platform/x86: int3472: Rework AVDD second sensor quirk handling Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] platform/x86: int3472: Make regulator supply name configurable Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 18:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-17 9:52 ` Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] platform/x86: int3472: Avoid GPIO regulator spikes Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] platform/x86: int3472: Prepare for registering more than 1 GPIO regulator Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 18:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] platform/x86: int3472: Add handshake pin support Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 18:16 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-04-17 10:56 ` Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] platform/x86: int3472: Debug log when remapping pins Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z__z_G21Ro2jGDkP@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=bingbu.cao@intel.com \
--cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
--cc=duanek@chorus.net \
--cc=hao.yao@intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.