From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, "Nilay Shroff" <nilay@linux.ibm.com>,
"Shinichiro Kawasaki" <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/15] block: simplify elevator reset for updating nr_hw_queues
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 08:58:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_xdtNiZb38ubXVe@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250410153417.GA12430@lst.de>
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 05:34:18PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 09:30:17PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > @@ -5071,9 +4984,15 @@ static void __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
> > blk_mq_debugfs_register_hctxs(q);
> > }
> >
> > -switch_back:
> > - list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list)
> > - blk_mq_elv_switch_back(&head, q);
> > + list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list) {
> > + const char *name = "none";
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&q->elevator_lock);
> > + if (q->elevator && !blk_queue_dying(q))
> > + name = q->elevator->type->elevator_name;
> > + __elevator_change(q, name, true);
> > + mutex_unlock(&q->elevator_lock);
> > + }
>
> Coming back to this after looking through the next patches.
>
> Why do we even need the __elevator_change call here? We've not
> actually disabled the elevator, and we prevent other callers
> from changing it.
>
> As you pass in the force argument this now always calls
> elevator_switch and thus blk_mq_init_sched. But why?
sched tags is built over hctx and depends on ->nr_hw_queues,
when nr_hw_queues is changed, sched tags has to be rebuilt.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-14 0:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-10 13:30 [PATCH 00/15] block: unify elevator changing and fix lockdep warning Ming Lei
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 01/15] block: don't call freeze queue in elevator_switch() and elevator_disable() Ming Lei
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 02/15] block: add two helpers for registering/un-registering sched debugfs Ming Lei
2025-04-10 14:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 03/15] block: move sched debugfs register into elvevator_register_queue Ming Lei
2025-04-10 14:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-14 0:42 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 04/15] block: prevent elevator switch during updating nr_hw_queues Ming Lei
2025-04-10 14:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-14 0:54 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-14 6:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-15 2:03 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-11 19:13 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-14 0:55 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 05/15] block: simplify elevator reset for " Ming Lei
2025-04-10 14:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-10 15:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-14 0:58 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-04-14 6:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-15 2:05 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 06/15] block: add helper of elevator_change() Ming Lei
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 07/15] block: move blk_unregister_queue() & device_del() after freeze wait Ming Lei
2025-04-14 6:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-15 2:26 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 08/15] block: add `struct elev_change_ctx` for unifying elevator change Ming Lei
2025-04-14 6:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 09/15] block: " Ming Lei
2025-04-10 18:37 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-14 1:22 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-15 12:30 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-16 1:49 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 10/15] block: pass elevator_queue to elv_register_queue & unregister_queue Ming Lei
2025-04-14 6:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-15 2:31 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-16 4:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 11/15] block: move elv_register[unregister]_queue out of elevator_lock Ming Lei
2025-04-11 19:20 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-14 1:24 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-15 9:39 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-15 10:32 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 12/15] block: move debugfs/sysfs register out of freezing queue Ming Lei
2025-04-10 18:57 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-14 1:42 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-15 9:37 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-15 10:06 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-15 11:15 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-15 11:54 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-15 12:21 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-15 12:41 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 13/15] block: remove several ->elevator_lock Ming Lei
2025-04-10 19:07 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-14 1:46 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 14/15] block: move hctx cpuhp add/del out of queue freezing Ming Lei
2025-04-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 15/15] block: move wbt_enable_default() out of queue freezing from scheduler's ->exit() Ming Lei
2025-04-10 19:20 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-14 1:55 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z_xdtNiZb38ubXVe@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.