Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] clk: qcom: Add dispcc clock driver for x1e80100

[Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>]

On 23-12-15 12:45:11, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 14/12/2023 16:49, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > From: Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@quicinc.com>
> > 
> > Add the dispcc clock driver for x1e80100.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@quicinc.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> > ---
> 
> > +static struct platform_driver disp_cc_x1e80100_driver = {
> > +	.probe = disp_cc_x1e80100_probe,
> > +	.driver = {
> > +		.name = "disp_cc-x1e80100",
> > +		.of_match_table = disp_cc_x1e80100_match_table,
> > +	},
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int __init disp_cc_x1e80100_init(void)
> > +{
> > +	return platform_driver_register(&disp_cc_x1e80100_driver);
> > +}
> > +subsys_initcall(disp_cc_x1e80100_init);
> > +
> > +static void __exit disp_cc_x1e80100_exit(void)
> > +{
> > +	platform_driver_unregister(&disp_cc_x1e80100_driver);
> > +}
> > +module_exit(disp_cc_x1e80100_exit);
> > +
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QTI DISPCC X1E80100 Driver");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > 
> 
> And we don't even do the odd underscore insertion consistently. For whatever
> reason "DISPCC" instead of "DISP_CC"
> 
> Just to reiterate the underscores should be dropped from these clock
> controller names and defines entirely, they just eat up bytes in databases.
> 
> .name = "dispcc-x1e80100"
> 
> ("QTI DISPCC X1E80100 Driver"); better but IMO we could just a complete word
> here
> 
> "Display Clock Controller" there's no need to abbreviate.

Maybe, but I think it's better to stay aligned with other platforms.
So please check SM8550, SM8650, and so on.

> 
> ---
> bod