All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Felix Janda <felix.janda@posteo.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] io: Assert we have a sensible off_t
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 22:33:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Za4MLpu/HlP60Oea@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877ck2x8uc.fsf@gentoo.org>

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 04:58:07AM +0000, Sam James wrote:
> >>  - we don't really need this patch all
> >>  - but cleaning up xfs_assert_largefile to just use static_assert would
> >>    probably be nice to have anyway
> >
> > Thanks, I agree, but I think static_assert is C11 (and then it gets a
> > nicer name in C23). If it's still fine for us, I can then use it.
> >
> > Does it change your thinking at all or should I send a v4 with it
> > included?
> 
> ping. I don't mind doing a followup, but I'd love to get this in given
> there's a bunch of other projects still to handle with this sort of
> problem.

Well, we certainly should drop this patch from the series.  Adding
a cleanup to switch the existing odd way of asserting the size to
static_assert would be nice, but I don't think is required.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-22  6:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-15  1:36 [PATCH v3 1/4] Remove use of LFS64 interfaces Sam James
2023-12-15  1:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] io: Assert we have a sensible off_t Sam James
2023-12-19  5:19   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-12-19  5:54   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-26 20:49     ` Sam James
2024-01-22  4:58       ` Sam James
2024-01-22  6:33         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-01-22  7:22           ` Sam James
2023-12-15  1:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] build: Request 64-bit time_t where possible Sam James
2023-12-19  5:27   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-12-15  1:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] io: Adapt to >= 64-bit time_t Sam James
2023-12-19  5:27   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-12-19  5:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] Remove use of LFS64 interfaces Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Za4MLpu/HlP60Oea@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=felix.janda@posteo.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.