From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAC022C68E for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="Sz3CtW8T" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1B9823C0 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:47:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 6E1B9823C0 Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pandora-2019 header.b=Sz3CtW8T X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.098 X-Spam-Level: Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xl03Bl9hQo0A for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:47:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk (pandora.armlinux.org.uk [IPv6:2001:4d48:ad52:32c8:5054:ff:fe00:142]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8D8C82333 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:47:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org A8D8C82333 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=BZWJhywUMRRIXvtL5doMOpnSiLPQBWG9w9WPF2MUO4c=; b=Sz3CtW8TvMYVj95XL1EZCET2A+ QamuonxIFNT3zYkRLRtfqxw7SE6Ou+c1sDlHOm3gafCTRQqOLJZCqlQDm5FD6J4qrogV6aC9NBqKU UvioOgQ7gVTi/liinVC4kVe/e4buW1OQKg1r4GMXP3iDla1Qt5/Ci+N1I7TqyALOM7ZH/njEyXM+O kqJMAfgr9yHj6be0TqV5AqRnblBaGfn2ZJHMunrt6qJ0b7/ZJ87rjdKUjRsvXgIYphw4O44+TlX5o PSgdX1SN3rxuaPmO/lCvJycV2gVlF4hse5S9MWc2dj0rsOcECr0O+epZD/m8Mped50SRNjDOgOXs2 5FXDnxHg==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([fd8f:7570:feb6:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:39864) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rPKUr-0002Ja-0t; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:47:13 +0000 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rPKUm-0002tU-5o; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:47:08 +0000 Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:47:08 +0000 From: "Russell King (Oracle)" To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Jonathan Cameron , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org, acpica-devel@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , jianyong.wu@arm.com, justin.he@arm.com, James Morse Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 02/21] ACPI: processor: Add support for processors described as container packages Message-ID: References: <20240111175908.00002f46@Huawei.com> <20240112092520.00001278@Huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: Russell King (Oracle) On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 04:01:40PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > In any case, it is always better to work on top of the current > mainline code IMO. That's fine if one is starting to do some work now, but that is not the case with this. The first posting was almost a year ago: https://lwn.net/Articles/922127/ which likely means that it's been around for at 18 months or more, and we can also see that this patch was in that original patch set. What the history of this patch is before the first posting... only James would be able to answer that and I feel that we're highly unlikely to get any kind of response. Anyway, consider this patch dropped from the series. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last! From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD1A7C3DA79 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:49:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=TyiioT5omOPr7ZE0+hI9o2H6D0FJNohR4U7UM02i0W0=; b=TDb4jRjPUebvwq xxyWNQ9YdJ8lhF+txxcsuamjr3v+x4RfhxNcGDQOvTyexrZW0E48xYXS0fFZPBvcrhgk5jT7VsCTg Uvx6VE3zkCTxt+Y+lRPplO3gZIx1BQr3PdTXB5b1aOZAN8tzwsSEaK6ctr8Ab7LujJYu8hiw/xc1R HEyNLwDV83jmanRHeDIUJ5JirF2x/gcxN4oIQB98/tc0w1NZTIWNCKhS+RKnk5MpcDssUK/qpjg0N vdFbum6/l/kTg6DwQ9GWL85JTIpdsEKrZdgK1wgvsf66g+45yUwI9lo8G0+Cuv+uz1SXUczHpqVc+ WQTV8gqs/4Rf6cxnsxoA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rPKXF-008c3Y-13; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:49:41 +0000 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([2001:4d48:ad52:32c8:5054:ff:fe00:142]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rPKXC-008bou-09; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:49:39 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=BZWJhywUMRRIXvtL5doMOpnSiLPQBWG9w9WPF2MUO4c=; b=Sz3CtW8TvMYVj95XL1EZCET2A+ QamuonxIFNT3zYkRLRtfqxw7SE6Ou+c1sDlHOm3gafCTRQqOLJZCqlQDm5FD6J4qrogV6aC9NBqKU UvioOgQ7gVTi/liinVC4kVe/e4buW1OQKg1r4GMXP3iDla1Qt5/Ci+N1I7TqyALOM7ZH/njEyXM+O kqJMAfgr9yHj6be0TqV5AqRnblBaGfn2ZJHMunrt6qJ0b7/ZJ87rjdKUjRsvXgIYphw4O44+TlX5o PSgdX1SN3rxuaPmO/lCvJycV2gVlF4hse5S9MWc2dj0rsOcECr0O+epZD/m8Mped50SRNjDOgOXs2 5FXDnxHg==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([fd8f:7570:feb6:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:39864) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rPKUr-0002Ja-0t; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:47:13 +0000 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rPKUm-0002tU-5o; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:47:08 +0000 Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:47:08 +0000 From: "Russell King (Oracle)" To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Jonathan Cameron , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org, acpica-devel@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , jianyong.wu@arm.com, justin.he@arm.com, James Morse Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 02/21] ACPI: processor: Add support for processors described as container packages Message-ID: References: <20240111175908.00002f46@Huawei.com> <20240112092520.00001278@Huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240115_024938_101841_7B5573E4 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.38 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 04:01:40PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > In any case, it is always better to work on top of the current > mainline code IMO. That's fine if one is starting to do some work now, but that is not the case with this. The first posting was almost a year ago: https://lwn.net/Articles/922127/ which likely means that it's been around for at 18 months or more, and we can also see that this patch was in that original patch set. What the history of this patch is before the first posting... only James would be able to answer that and I feel that we're highly unlikely to get any kind of response. Anyway, consider this patch dropped from the series. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last! _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D75AC3DA79 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:50:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=WoVn2HV39haFtYa7HeZL8Bz+FD0W3EMZcfjAflaD+jw=; b=UQUcFEpw6j668N UNeXwlTm6r4M5BNnzqJX6wJXltDHrLCDVtC/owJnKBQYelrxGyzWyjryLc9kosQQm2sODcAiMpfoI vV0YmPtkwFufQrqOHV+d7j4/59QehECUIgONjnVP9tsx0hBmkeFTNeqwZg2DnrqqXPQnYyBZ+0AGQ zRGd+2Z96RHqwofxAeY5IQIXbWGF/gjhInK3SbM653U7/ErEEs6KG+PbVQqZmmj1c0DujcyvwNCi8 Q4vMQZ3DQrXXMaK0/vfrQ/IBvjZ1fTJA0Ke68ytKifJ4lftN4h+3Wm1FIEgfO417sJYJtK3YOzUb4 PIOJ7Slho8WC+MO24qYg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rPKXE-008c3R-2b; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:49:40 +0000 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([2001:4d48:ad52:32c8:5054:ff:fe00:142]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rPKXC-008bou-09; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:49:39 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=BZWJhywUMRRIXvtL5doMOpnSiLPQBWG9w9WPF2MUO4c=; b=Sz3CtW8TvMYVj95XL1EZCET2A+ QamuonxIFNT3zYkRLRtfqxw7SE6Ou+c1sDlHOm3gafCTRQqOLJZCqlQDm5FD6J4qrogV6aC9NBqKU UvioOgQ7gVTi/liinVC4kVe/e4buW1OQKg1r4GMXP3iDla1Qt5/Ci+N1I7TqyALOM7ZH/njEyXM+O kqJMAfgr9yHj6be0TqV5AqRnblBaGfn2ZJHMunrt6qJ0b7/ZJ87rjdKUjRsvXgIYphw4O44+TlX5o PSgdX1SN3rxuaPmO/lCvJycV2gVlF4hse5S9MWc2dj0rsOcECr0O+epZD/m8Mped50SRNjDOgOXs2 5FXDnxHg==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([fd8f:7570:feb6:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:39864) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rPKUr-0002Ja-0t; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:47:13 +0000 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rPKUm-0002tU-5o; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:47:08 +0000 Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:47:08 +0000 From: "Russell King (Oracle)" To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Jonathan Cameron , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org, acpica-devel@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , jianyong.wu@arm.com, justin.he@arm.com, James Morse Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 02/21] ACPI: processor: Add support for processors described as container packages Message-ID: References: <20240111175908.00002f46@Huawei.com> <20240112092520.00001278@Huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240115_024938_101841_7B5573E4 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.38 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 04:01:40PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > In any case, it is always better to work on top of the current > mainline code IMO. That's fine if one is starting to do some work now, but that is not the case with this. The first posting was almost a year ago: https://lwn.net/Articles/922127/ which likely means that it's been around for at 18 months or more, and we can also see that this patch was in that original patch set. What the history of this patch is before the first posting... only James would be able to answer that and I feel that we're highly unlikely to get any kind of response. Anyway, consider this patch dropped from the series. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last! _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel