From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: sfp-bus: fix SFP mode detect from bitrate
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 16:07:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZaVYKgCPZaidGimU@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240115165848.110ad8f9@device-28.home>
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 04:58:48PM +0100, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> Hello Russell,
>
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 12:43:38 +0000
> "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > The referenced commit moved the setting of the Autoneg and pause bits
> > early in sfp_parse_support(). However, we check whether the modes are
> > empty before using the bitrate to set some modes. Setting these bits
> > so early causes that test to always be false, preventing this working,
> > and thus some modules that used to work no longer do.
> >
> > Move them just before the call to the quirk.
> >
> > Fixes: 8110633db49d ("net: sfp-bus: allow SFP quirks to override Autoneg and pause bits")
> > Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
>
> I don't have modules to trigger the bug, however the fix looks OK to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
In case there's interest:
Identifier : 0x03 (SFP)
Extended identifier : 0x04 (GBIC/SFP defined by 2-
wire interface ID)
Connector : 0x07 (LC)
Transceiver codes : 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x20 0x1
0 0x01 0x00 0x00
Transceiver type : FC: intermediate distance (I
)
Transceiver type : FC: Longwave laser (LL)
Transceiver type : FC: Single Mode (SM)
Encoding : 0x01 (8B/10B)
BR, Nominal : 1300MBd
...
Laser wavelength : 1550nm
Vendor name : FiberStore
Vendor OUI : 00:00:00
Vendor PN : SFP-GE-BX
Vendor rev : A0
which is the module I use for my internet connectivity between the
critical internal systems and the rest of the planet... so the regression
got noticed when I upgraded the kernel on Friday!
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-15 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-15 12:43 [PATCH net] net: sfp-bus: fix SFP mode detect from bitrate Russell King (Oracle)
2024-01-15 15:58 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-01-15 16:07 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2024-05-30 10:39 ` Daniel Golle
2024-06-12 12:33 ` Greg KH
2024-01-17 2:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZaVYKgCPZaidGimU@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.