From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78E8CC47258 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A783CE311 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 12:41:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DCDC3C88E1 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 12:41:31 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-3.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=chrubis@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A8601A011D2 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 12:41:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67494219C0; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:41:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1705491689; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HRCAKU2+WVEjq/rMIG0ZxWfU6EOa5Tn9ysb0LkbOQ3Y=; b=nb+x5ADFDKbN6cGu1+cwz32eSJ3XfO9AFp2Xi+PYLAeRmTzdnKgG37KdHT8/U54KyBQYEx yKubWaYwrFxEf9CR7VLtFdfRbRpNZcXU5DRe4BvcZDxN7xCRlc6GJJPitx5HR51/5nZ35y qt66TezuoiQZ4m3xA5lULNpiaGRwlL8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1705491689; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HRCAKU2+WVEjq/rMIG0ZxWfU6EOa5Tn9ysb0LkbOQ3Y=; b=9kBpCvq+jtxUc12IskNTuLT3jJ5KjbhSNTpxVSo0ezx3LfcO0gqYbGSPtq+/1eqXtZdujs lYd0lirZl4zZ3pCQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1705491689; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HRCAKU2+WVEjq/rMIG0ZxWfU6EOa5Tn9ysb0LkbOQ3Y=; b=nb+x5ADFDKbN6cGu1+cwz32eSJ3XfO9AFp2Xi+PYLAeRmTzdnKgG37KdHT8/U54KyBQYEx yKubWaYwrFxEf9CR7VLtFdfRbRpNZcXU5DRe4BvcZDxN7xCRlc6GJJPitx5HR51/5nZ35y qt66TezuoiQZ4m3xA5lULNpiaGRwlL8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1705491689; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HRCAKU2+WVEjq/rMIG0ZxWfU6EOa5Tn9ysb0LkbOQ3Y=; b=9kBpCvq+jtxUc12IskNTuLT3jJ5KjbhSNTpxVSo0ezx3LfcO0gqYbGSPtq+/1eqXtZdujs lYd0lirZl4zZ3pCQ== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DB4013751; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id 5CNsEem8p2VwSQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:41:29 +0000 Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 12:41:38 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Petr Vorel Message-ID: References: <20240117101801.12536-1-chrubis@suse.cz> <20240117110744.GA2692706@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240117110744.GA2692706@pevik> Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=nb+x5ADF; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=9kBpCvq+ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.12 / 50.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DWL_DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim,suse.cz:email]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-0.07)[62.28%] X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd1.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 67494219C0 X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] lib: TST_EXP_FAIL: Fix the *_ARR_() macros X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > I'm sorry, I haven't noticed the problem. tst_test_macros.h is getting quite > complex, maybe we should add some comments into the header. Pushed, thanks. I guess that ideal fix would be comparing the output from the newlib TST_EXP_* tescases with expected output. That would actually catch most of the bugs introduced in there. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp