From: Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net>
To: Phillip Susi <phill@thesusis.net>
Cc: linux-lvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 07:22:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZaeAJtE+0Gmp2b0E@mail.bitfolk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZabjW4HWOSfy8sRN@mail.bitfolk.com>
Hi Phillip,
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 08:13:15PM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 01:24:29PM -0500, Phillip Susi wrote:
> > No, it wouldn't be a problem without the partition table. ext4 uses its
> > own block size, which is pretty much always 4k. It doesn't know or care
> > about the underlying disk logical sector size.
>
> I've found quite a few people having similar problems to me so I'm
> not sure about this, but I haven't had chance to test it yet. I
> will try it out before I explore hdparm.
I've tested ext4 directly on the LV with no partition table now and
you're correct - no issues there! Apologies for doubting you - so
many different vague accounts of issues out there.
So, the actual problem here is something about the MBR partition
table. Off-topic now for this list but I wonder if there is a safe
and reliable way to modify such a partition table after sync to
allow this to work…
Thanks,
Andy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-17 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-15 7:30 Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices? Andy Smith
2024-01-15 21:07 ` Roger Heflin
2024-01-16 18:24 ` Phillip Susi
2024-01-16 20:13 ` Andy Smith
2024-01-17 7:22 ` Andy Smith [this message]
2024-01-17 12:13 ` Roger Heflin
2024-01-17 14:10 ` Phillip Susi
2024-01-20 4:45 ` Andy Smith
2024-01-20 18:00 ` Phillip Susi
2024-01-20 20:56 ` Andy Smith
2024-01-24 16:18 ` Phillip Susi
2024-01-24 21:17 ` Roger Heflin
2024-01-25 19:05 ` Phillip Susi
2024-01-17 14:06 ` Phillip Susi
2024-01-16 19:30 ` Ilia Zykov
2024-01-16 20:17 ` Andy Smith
2024-01-17 10:36 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2024-01-17 11:21 ` Andy Smith
2024-01-17 11:48 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2024-01-17 14:24 ` Phillip Susi
2024-01-17 19:05 ` Ilia Zykov
2024-01-26 1:21 ` Glenn Washburn
2024-01-26 1:35 ` Demi Marie Obenour
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZaeAJtE+0Gmp2b0E@mail.bitfolk.com \
--to=andy@strugglers.net \
--cc=linux-lvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=phill@thesusis.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.