Re: [PATCH] x86/PVH: Dom0 "broken ELF" reporting adjustments

["Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>]

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 09:53:26AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> elf_load_binary() isn't the primary source of brokenness being
> indicated. Therefore make the respective log message there conditional
> (much like PV has it), and add another instance when elf_xen_parse()
> failed (again matching behavior in the PV case).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> 
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c
> @@ -570,6 +570,8 @@ static int __init pvh_load_kernel(struct
>      if ( (rc = elf_xen_parse(&elf, &parms, true)) != 0 )
>      {
>          printk("Unable to parse kernel for ELFNOTES\n");
> +        if ( elf_check_broken(&elf) )
> +            printk("Xen dom0 kernel broken ELF: %s\n", elf_check_broken(&elf));

I would rather use "%pd: kernel broken ELF: %s\n", in case this gets
used for loading more than dom0 in the dom0less case.  The 'Xen'
prefix is IMO useless here (I know it was here before).

Thanks, Roger.