From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Vasily Averin <vasily.averin@linux.dev>,
Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] fs/locks: Fix file lock cache accounting, again
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 10:49:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zaj0LYIJRL9TNj2R@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6667b799702e1815bd4e4f7744eddbc0bd042bb7.camel@kernel.org>
On Wed 17-01-24 14:00:55, Jeff Layton wrote:
> I'm really not a fan of tunables or different kconfig options,
> especially for something niche like this.
I completely agree with that. We do have plethora of kernel objects
which are accounted and we really do not want to have a kernel cmd line
option for many/each of them. Kernel memory accounting can be disabled
through kernel cmd line already.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-18 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-17 16:14 [PATCH RFC 0/4] Fix file lock cache accounting, again Josh Poimboeuf
2024-01-17 16:14 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] fs/locks: " Josh Poimboeuf
2024-01-17 19:00 ` Jeff Layton
2024-01-17 19:39 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-01-17 20:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-17 21:02 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-01-17 22:20 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-01-17 22:56 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-01-22 5:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-22 17:38 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-01-26 9:50 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-01-30 11:04 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-01-19 7:47 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-01-17 21:19 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-01-17 21:50 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-01-18 9:49 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2024-01-17 16:14 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] fs/locks: Add CONFIG_FLOCK_ACCOUNTING Josh Poimboeuf
2024-01-17 16:14 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] mitigations: Expand 'mitigations=off' to include optional software mitigations Josh Poimboeuf
2024-01-17 16:14 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] mitigations: Add flock cache accounting to 'mitigations=off' Josh Poimboeuf
2024-01-18 9:04 ` Michal Koutný
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zaj0LYIJRL9TNj2R@tiehlicka \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vasily.averin@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.