From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
To: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Radu Pirea <radu-nicolae.pirea@oss.nxp.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] net: macsec: Only require headroom/tailroom from offload implementer if .mdo_insert_tx_tag is implemented
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 10:29:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zazj5KI7BZPnLoc2@hog> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240118191811.50271-2-rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
2024-01-18, 11:18:07 -0800, Rahul Rameshbabu wrote:
> A number of MACsec offload implementers do not implement
> .mdo_insert_tx_tag. These implementers also do not specify the needed
> headroom/tailroom and depend on the default in the core MACsec stack.
FWIW, I had the same concern when Radu submitted these changes, and he
answered that the extra room was only needed for SW, not for offload:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/a5ef22bc-2457-5eef-7cff-529711c5c242@oss.nxp.com/
I'm not really objecting to this patch, but is it fixing a bug? If so,
it would be useful to describe the problem you're seeing in the commit
message for this change.
Does your driver require the default headroom/tailroom?
> Fixes: a73d8779d61a ("net: macsec: introduce mdo_insert_tx_tag")
> Cc: Radu Pirea (NXP OSS) <radu-nicolae.pirea@oss.nxp.com>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
> Signed-off-by: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
--
Sabrina
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-21 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-18 19:18 [PATCH net v2 1/2] Revert "net: macsec: use skb_ensure_writable_head_tail to expand the skb" Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-01-18 19:18 ` [PATCH net v2 2/2] net: macsec: Only require headroom/tailroom from offload implementer if .mdo_insert_tx_tag is implemented Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-01-21 9:29 ` Sabrina Dubroca [this message]
2024-01-22 18:06 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-01-21 9:32 ` [PATCH net v2 1/2] Revert "net: macsec: use skb_ensure_writable_head_tail to expand the skb" Sabrina Dubroca
2024-01-23 9:19 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-01-23 16:27 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-01-24 1:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zazj5KI7BZPnLoc2@hog \
--to=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=radu-nicolae.pirea@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=rrameshbabu@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.