From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/NMI: refine "watchdog stuck" log message
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:52:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbEyU4HQjYG7biii@macbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87108f1d-4b13-4c1e-9432-4f14d4f5c12d@suse.com>
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 04:21:24PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Observing
>
> "Testing NMI watchdog on all CPUs: 0 stuck"
>
> it felt like it's not quite right, but I still read it as "no CPU stuck;
> all good", when really the system suffered from what 6bdb965178bb
> ("x86/intel: ensure Global Performance Counter Control is setup
> correctly") works around. Convert this to
>
> "Testing NMI watchdog on all CPUs: {0} stuck"
To make this even more obvious, maybe it could be prefixed with "error":
"Testing NMI watchdog on all CPUs: error {0} stuck"
Hm, albeit I don't like it that much
>
> or, with multiple CPUs having an issue, e.g.
>
> "Testing NMI watchdog on all CPUs: {0,40} stuck"
>
> to make more obvious that a lone number is not a count of CPUs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
> ---
> In principle "sep" could also fulfill the job of "ok"; it felt to me as
> if this may not be liked very much, though.
I think I prefer it the current way.
Thanks, Roger.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-24 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-24 15:21 [PATCH] x86/NMI: refine "watchdog stuck" log message Jan Beulich
2024-01-24 15:52 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2024-01-24 15:55 ` Andrew Cooper
2024-01-25 8:05 ` Jan Beulich
2024-01-25 9:10 ` Roger Pau Monné
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZbEyU4HQjYG7biii@macbook \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.