From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 103C0C47258 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:04:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0223CE1D6 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:04:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (in-7.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 157B33C5D1E for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:03:57 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-7.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=chrubis@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8116B200C67 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:03:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E62A21E21; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:03:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1706180635; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kqsS+t0mWOa5o8YVEsAUPKEH/2WY6qUD2PhHmAt/tW0=; b=NHWKuNtbrIz9IscP88DLyPkCLv7g6dLfTy9AAq9Xl67gQuOk/MlbMZIKf3VdRvJMT/Nkwe ZhOCPx4G61QF70N8q/FJjj/FbupFmEJkUap8Nb/8XP2rnlprbhcfdM5rTtKZQHbsn9raPk CzWjU0/V8KUwU9BvuE3SqHjWDMn3WKM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1706180635; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kqsS+t0mWOa5o8YVEsAUPKEH/2WY6qUD2PhHmAt/tW0=; b=nIs9hq2duWXeDV2SOxxJuNx3KaR+P0jWJIHEPvpc8G/PzRtuSDSxYBIrItwLqv0+jnqnnD bYC0snPh6mzuY2Dw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1706180635; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kqsS+t0mWOa5o8YVEsAUPKEH/2WY6qUD2PhHmAt/tW0=; b=NHWKuNtbrIz9IscP88DLyPkCLv7g6dLfTy9AAq9Xl67gQuOk/MlbMZIKf3VdRvJMT/Nkwe ZhOCPx4G61QF70N8q/FJjj/FbupFmEJkUap8Nb/8XP2rnlprbhcfdM5rTtKZQHbsn9raPk CzWjU0/V8KUwU9BvuE3SqHjWDMn3WKM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1706180635; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kqsS+t0mWOa5o8YVEsAUPKEH/2WY6qUD2PhHmAt/tW0=; b=nIs9hq2duWXeDV2SOxxJuNx3KaR+P0jWJIHEPvpc8G/PzRtuSDSxYBIrItwLqv0+jnqnnD bYC0snPh6mzuY2Dw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66453134C3; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:03:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id G05jFRtAsmUDcgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:03:55 +0000 Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:04:08 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Li Wang Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.80 / 50.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-0.999]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:email]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-7.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] LTP Release preparations X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: LTP List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > Test based on the latest LTP (main-branch + libswap-patchset) results as: Thanks a lot! > splice07: rhel9.3 + kernel-6.7.0, all-arches > > 86 splice07.c:62: TINFO: /dev/zero -> ... > 87 splice07.c:54: TPASS: splice() on /dev/zero -> file : EINVAL (22) > 88 splice07.c:54: TPASS: splice() on /dev/zero -> O_PATH file : EBADF (9) > 89 splice07.c:54: TPASS: splice() on /dev/zero -> directory : EBADF (9) > 90 splice07.c:54: TPASS: splice() on /dev/zero -> /dev/zero : EBADF (9) > 91 splice07.c:54: TPASS: splice() on /dev/zero -> /proc/self/maps > : EBADF (9) > 92 splice07.c:54: TPASS: splice() on /dev/zero -> pipe read end : EBADF (9) > 93 splice07.c:54: TFAIL: splice() on /dev/zero -> pipe write end succeeded We see that one too, on a random set of kernels the splice from zero to pipe succeeds. We are trying to investigate. > 94 splice07.c:54: TPASS: splice() on /dev/zero -> unix socket : EINVAL (22) > 95 splice07.c:54: TPASS: splice() on /dev/zero -> inet socket : EINVAL (22) > > > proc_sched_rt01: rhel-9.3(5.14.0-362.8.1.el9_3), all-arches > > 10 proc_sched_rt01.c:45: TFAIL: Expect: timeslice_ms > 0 after > reset to default > 11 proc_sched_rt01.c:51: TPASS: echo 0 > > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_us : EINVAL (22) > 12 proc_sched_rt01.c:53: TFAIL: echo -1 > > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_us invalid retval 2: SUCCESS (0) > 13 proc_sched_rt01.c:59: TPASS: echo -2 > > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us : EINVAL (22) > 14 proc_sched_rt01.c:72: TFAIL: echo rt_period_us+1 > > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us invalid retval 1: SUCCESS (0) > > > sched_rr_get_interval01: rhel-9.3(5.14.0-362.8.1.el9_3), all-arches > > 9 sched_rr_get_interval01.c:44: TINFO: Testing variant: vDSO or > syscall with libc spec > 10 sched_rr_get_interval01.c:61: TPASS: sched_rr_get_interval() passed > 11 sched_rr_get_interval01.c:68: TPASS: Time quantum 0s 100000000ns > 12 sched_rr_get_interval01.c:76: TFAIL: > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rr_timeslice_ms != 100 got -1 > 13 sched_rr_get_interval01.c:44: TINFO: Testing variant: syscall > with old kernel spec > 14 sched_rr_get_interval01.c:61: TPASS: sched_rr_get_interval() passed > 15 sched_rr_get_interval01.c:68: TPASS: Time quantum 0s 100000000ns > 16 sched_rr_get_interval01.c:76: TFAIL: > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rr_timeslice_ms != 100 got -1 These are most likely missing bacports for the sysctl fixes. > sched_getattr01: rhel-9.3(5.14.0-362.8.1.el9_3), all-arches > > 7 sched_getattr01 1 TFAIL : sched_getattr01.c:57: > sched_setattr() failed: errno=EPERM(1): Operation not permitted Does this one still fail on a freshly rebooted machine? My guess is that if we succeed to set invalid values in the proc_sched_rt01 it may confuse the kernel enough to fail this test as well. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp