From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] KVM: arm64: Improvements to GICv3 LPI injection
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:47:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbKCqGw0GtSEfSPZ@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86zfwt7k2e.wl-maz@kernel.org>
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:02:01AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
[...]
> > I would've liked to have benchmark data showing the improvement on top
> > of upstream with this series, but I'm currently having issues with our
> > internal infrastructure and upstream kernels. However, this series has
> > been found to have a near 2x performance improvement to redis-memtier [*]
> > benchmarks on our kernel tree.
>
> It'd be really good to have upstream-based numbers, with details of
> the actual setup (device assignment? virtio?) so that we can compare
> things and even track regressions in the future.
Yeah, that sort of thing isn't optional IMO, I just figured that getting
reviews on this would be a bit more productive while I try and recreate
the test correctly on top of upstream.
The test setup I based my "2x" statement on is 4 16 vCPU client VMs
talking to 1 16 vCPU server VM over NIC VFs assigned to the
respective VMs. 16 TX + 16 RX queues for each NIC. As I'm sure you're
aware, I know damn near nothing about the Redis setup itself, and I'll
need to do a bit of work to translate the thing I was using into a
script.
--
Thanks,
Oliver
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-25 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-24 20:48 [PATCH 00/15] KVM: arm64: Improvements to GICv3 LPI injection Oliver Upton
2024-01-24 20:48 ` [PATCH 01/15] KVM: arm64: vgic: Store LPIs in an xarray Oliver Upton
2024-02-05 6:05 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-01-24 20:48 ` [PATCH 02/15] KVM: arm64: vgic: Use xarray to find LPI in vgic_get_lpi() Oliver Upton
2024-01-24 20:48 ` [PATCH 03/15] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Iterate the xarray to find pending LPIs Oliver Upton
2024-01-24 20:48 ` [PATCH 04/15] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Walk the LPI xarray in vgic_copy_lpi_list() Oliver Upton
2024-01-25 9:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-25 9:24 ` Oliver Upton
2024-01-24 20:48 ` [PATCH 05/15] KVM: arm64: vgic: Get rid of the LPI linked-list Oliver Upton
2024-01-25 9:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-24 20:49 ` [PATCH 06/15] KVM: arm64: vgic: Use atomics to count LPIs Oliver Upton
2024-01-24 20:49 ` [PATCH 07/15] KVM: arm64: vgic: Free LPI vgic_irq structs in an RCU-safe manner Oliver Upton
2024-01-24 20:49 ` [PATCH 08/15] KVM: arm64: vgic: Rely on RCU protection in vgic_get_lpi() Oliver Upton
2024-01-24 20:49 ` [PATCH 09/15] KVM: arm64: vgic: Ensure the irq refcount is nonzero when taking a ref Oliver Upton
2024-01-25 10:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-24 20:49 ` [PATCH 10/15] KVM: arm64: vgic: Don't acquire the lpi_list_lock in vgic_put_irq() Oliver Upton
2024-01-24 20:49 ` [PATCH 11/15] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Lazily allocate LPI translation cache Oliver Upton
2024-01-25 10:19 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-25 15:13 ` Oliver Upton
2024-01-24 20:49 ` [PATCH 12/15] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Pick cache victim based on usage count Oliver Upton
2024-01-25 9:22 ` Oliver Upton
2024-01-25 10:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-25 15:34 ` Oliver Upton
2024-01-25 18:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-24 20:49 ` [PATCH 13/15] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Protect cached vgic_irq pointers with RCU Oliver Upton
2024-01-29 1:03 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-24 20:49 ` [PATCH 14/15] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Treat the LPI translation cache as an rculist Oliver Upton
2024-01-24 20:49 ` [PATCH 15/15] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Rely on RCU to protect translation cache reads Oliver Upton
2024-01-25 11:02 ` [PATCH 00/15] KVM: arm64: Improvements to GICv3 LPI injection Marc Zyngier
2024-01-25 15:47 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZbKCqGw0GtSEfSPZ@linux.dev \
--to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.