From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Xiaoling Song <xiaoling.song@intel.com>,
Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Add more CPU topology test cases
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 17:38:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbdyEDhz/pjuZNVE@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240118144857.2124034-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>
Hi Philippe,
A kindly ping.
Thanks,
Zhao
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:48:49PM +0800, Zhao Liu wrote:
> Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 22:48:49 +0800
> From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 0/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Add more CPU topology
> test cases
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1
>
> From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
>
> Hi list,
>
> Currently, test-smp-parse lacks the following cases:
> * The case to cover drawer and book parameters parsing in -smp.
> * The case to cover the full topology (with total 7 levels) to ensure
> that the topology-related calculations are correct.
> * The case to check smp_props.has_clusters of MachineClass.
>
> Thus, add the above cases to improve test coverage.
>
> In addition, people is trying to bump max_cpus to 4096 for PC machine
> [1]. Without considering other changes, it's only a matter of time
> before the maximum CPUs is raised. Therefore, aslo bump max_cpus to 4096
> in -smp related test cases as a start.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20231208122611.32311-1-anisinha@redhat.com/
>
> Regards,
> Zhao
>
> ---
> Zhao Liu (8):
> tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Use CPU number macros in invalid topology
> case
> tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Bump max_cpus to 4096
> tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Make test cases aware of the book/drawer
> tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Test "books" parameter in -smp
> tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Test "drawers" parameter in -smp
> tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Test "drawers" and "books" combination
> case
> tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Test the full 7-levels topology hierarchy
> tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Test smp_props.has_clusters
>
> tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c | 515 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 494 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-29 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-18 14:48 [PATCH 0/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Add more CPU topology test cases Zhao Liu
2024-01-18 14:48 ` [PATCH 1/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Use CPU number macros in invalid topology case Zhao Liu
2024-03-01 7:37 ` Thomas Huth
2024-01-18 14:48 ` [PATCH 2/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Bump max_cpus to 4096 Zhao Liu
2024-03-01 7:40 ` Thomas Huth
2024-03-01 7:59 ` Zhao Liu
2024-01-18 14:48 ` [PATCH 3/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Make test cases aware of the book/drawer Zhao Liu
2024-03-01 7:49 ` Thomas Huth
2024-01-18 14:48 ` [PATCH 4/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Test "books" parameter in -smp Zhao Liu
2024-03-01 7:52 ` Thomas Huth
2024-01-18 14:48 ` [PATCH 5/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Test "drawers" " Zhao Liu
2024-03-01 7:56 ` Thomas Huth
2024-01-18 14:48 ` [PATCH 6/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Test "drawers" and "books" combination case Zhao Liu
2024-01-18 14:48 ` [PATCH 7/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Test the full 7-levels topology hierarchy Zhao Liu
2024-03-01 7:59 ` Thomas Huth
2024-01-18 14:48 ` [PATCH 8/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Test smp_props.has_clusters Zhao Liu
2024-03-01 8:01 ` Thomas Huth
2024-01-29 2:37 ` [PATCH 0/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Add more CPU topology test cases Song, Xiaoling
2024-01-29 9:38 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2024-02-21 6:47 ` Zhao Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZbdyEDhz/pjuZNVE@intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=xiaoling.song@intel.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.