All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>,
	quentin@isovalent.com, daniel@iogearbox.net, ast@kernel.org,
	andrii@kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
	alan.maguire@oracle.com, memxor@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
	haoluo@google.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpftool: Support dumping kfunc prototypes from BTF
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:15:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbiwJcfN6snXZ0Vn@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <spuzs32tv6v5czb76gstpvisv2xkfzz2scqw4hmqncflhxoj66@hie6m7pctfdo>

On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 09:13:13AM -0700, Daniel Xu wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 01:11:17PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 06:35:33PM -0700, Daniel Xu wrote:
> > > This patch enables dumping kfunc prototypes from bpftool. This is useful
> > > b/c with this patch, end users will no longer have to manually define
> > > kfunc prototypes. For the kernel tree, this also means we can drop
> > > kfunc prototypes from:
> > > 
> > >         tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_kfuncs.h
> > >         tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
> > > 
> > > Example usage:
> > > 
> > >         $ make PAHOLE=/home/dxu/dev/pahole/build/pahole -j30 vmlinux
> > > 
> > >         $ ./tools/bpf/bpftool/bpftool btf dump file ./vmlinux format c | rg "__ksym;" | head -3
> > >         extern void cgroup_rstat_updated(struct cgroup * cgrp, int cpu) __ksym;
> > >         extern void cgroup_rstat_flush(struct cgroup * cgrp) __ksym;
> > >         extern struct bpf_key * bpf_lookup_user_key(u32 serial, u64 flags) __ksym;
> > 
> > hi,
> > I'm getting following declaration for bpf_rbtree_add_impl:
> > 
> > 	extern int bpf_rbtree_add_impl(struct bpf_rb_root * root, struct bpf_rb_node * node, bool (struct bpf_rb_node *, const struct bpf_rb_node *)* less, void * meta__ign, u64 off) __ksym; 
> > 
> > and it fails to compile with:
> > 
> > 	In file included from skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c:3:
> > 	./vmlinux.h:164511:141: error: expected ')'
> > 	 164511 | extern int bpf_rbtree_add_impl(struct bpf_rb_root * root, struct bpf_rb_node * node, bool (struct bpf_rb_node *, const struct bpf_rb_node *)* less, void * meta__ign, u64 off) __ksym;
> > 		|                                                                                                                                             ^
> > 	./vmlinux.h:164511:31: note: to match this '('
> > 	 164511 | extern int bpf_rbtree_add_impl(struct bpf_rb_root * root, struct bpf_rb_node * node, bool (struct bpf_rb_node *, const struct bpf_rb_node *)* less, void * meta__ign, u64 off) __ksym;
> > 
> > looks like the btf_dumper_type_only won't dump function pointer argument
> > properly.. I guess we should fix that, but looking at the other stuff in
> > vmlinux.h like *_ops struct we can print function pointers properly, so
> > perhaps another way around is to use btf_dumper interface instead
> 
> Ah, crap, looks like between all the branch switching I didn't build
> vmlinux with kfunc annotations. Having fixed that, I can repro this
> build failure.
> 
> I'll take a look and see what the best way to fix this is.
> 
> Given that end to end the whole flow basically works, should we start
> working on merging patches?

yes, the flow looks good to me.. will check the rest of the patches

jirka

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-30  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-29  1:35 [PATCH bpf-next] bpftool: Support dumping kfunc prototypes from BTF Daniel Xu
2024-01-29 12:11 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-01-29 16:13   ` Daniel Xu
2024-01-30  8:15     ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2024-01-30  4:33 ` Andrii Nakryiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZbiwJcfN6snXZ0Vn@krava \
    --to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=quentin@isovalent.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.