From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] migration: Fix return-path thread exit
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 17:53:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zby7o1O5Ox2NNbbP@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240201184853.890471-1-clg@redhat.com>
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 07:48:51PM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> Hello,
Hi, Cédric,
Thanks for the patches.
>
> Today, close_return_path_on_source() can perform a shutdown to exit
> the return-path thread if an error occured. However, migrate_fd_cleanup()
> does cleanups too early and the shutdown in close_return_path_on_source()
> fails, leaving the source and destination waiting for an event to occur.
>
> This little series tries to fix that. Comments welcome !
One thing I do agree is that relying on qemu_file_get_error(to_dst_file) in
close_return_path_on_source() is weird: IMHO we have better way to detect
"whether the migration has error" now, which is migrate_has_error().
For this specific issue, I think one long standing issue that might be
relevant is we have two QEMUFile (from_dst_file, to_dst_file) that share
the same QIOChannel now. Logically the two QEMUFile should be able to be
managed separately, say, close() of to_dst_file shouldn't affect the other.
However I don't think it's the case now, as qemu_fclose(to_dst_file) will
do qio_channel_close() already, which means there will be a side effect to
the other QEMUFile that its backing IOC is already closed.
Is this the issue we're facing? IOW, the close() of to_dst_file will not
properly kick the other thread who is blocked at reading from_dst_file,
while the shutdown() will kick it out?
If so, not sure whether we can somehow relay the real qio_channel_close()
to until the last user releases it? IOW, conditionally close() the channel
in qio_channel_finalize(), if the channel is still open? Would that make
sense?
Copy Dan too.
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-02 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-01 18:48 [PATCH 0/2] migration: Fix return-path thread exit Cédric Le Goater
2024-02-01 18:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] migration: Add a file_error argument to close_return_path_on_source() Cédric Le Goater
2024-02-02 14:30 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-02 14:45 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-02-01 18:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] migration: Fix return-path thread exit Cédric Le Goater
2024-02-02 14:42 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-02 14:51 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-02-02 15:11 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-05 3:37 ` Peter Xu
2024-02-05 10:17 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-02-02 9:53 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2024-02-02 13:04 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Cédric Le Goater
2024-02-05 10:32 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-02-06 2:42 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zby7o1O5Ox2NNbbP@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.