All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] t1405: remove unneeded cleanup step
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 08:59:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zc3EdG7K0NqV61rC@tanuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq4jeatz3n.fsf@gitster.g>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1999 bytes --]

On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:17:32PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> 
> > In 5e00514745 (t1405: explictly delete reflogs for reftable, 2022-01-31)
> > we have added a test that explicitly deletes the reflog when not using
> > the "files" backend. This was required because back then, the "reftable"
> > backend didn't yet delete reflogs when deleting their corresponding
> > branches, and thus subsequent tests would fail because some unexpected
> > reflogs still exist.
> >
> > The "reftable" backend was eventually changed though so that it behaves
> > the same as the "files" backend and deletes reflogs when deleting refs.
> > This was done to make the "reftable" backend behave like the "files"
> > backend as closely as possible so that it can act as a drop-in
> > replacement.
> >
> > The cleanup-style test is thus not required anymore. Remove it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
> > ---
> >  t/t1405-main-ref-store.sh | 6 ------
> >  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> 
> Again, makes sense.
> 
> This is a tangent, but artificial limitations we imposed on reftable
> to be more similar to files backend may be something we would want
> to reconsider once reftable hits mainline and people actively start
> using it.  Not having to lose the reflog only because you removed a
> branch by mistake would be a powerful thing, as it would allow you
> to resurrect the branch as well as its log.  Being able to have a
> branch 'foo', with work related to 'foo' kept inbranches 'foo/arc1'
> 'foo/arc2', etc., would be a very nice organizational tool.
> 
> But it is a good idea to start limited and later making it looser.
> These two limitations are something all users are already familiar
> with, so it is not as cripplingly bad as it smells anyway.

Yeah, I very much agree with what you say here. We have it in our
backlog to change this behaviour once the initial dust has settled.

Patrick

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-15  7:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-09  7:23 [PATCH 0/7] t: drop more REFFILES prereqs Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-09  7:23 ` [PATCH 1/7] t: move tests exercising the "files" backend Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-14 22:45   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-09  7:23 ` [PATCH 2/7] t0410: enable tests with extensions with non-default repo format Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-14 22:57   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-15  7:59     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-15 17:18       ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-09  7:23 ` [PATCH 3/7] t1400: exercise reflog with gaps with reftable backend Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-14 22:59   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-09  7:23 ` [PATCH 4/7] t1404: make D/F conflict tests compatible " Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-14 23:11   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-09  7:23 ` [PATCH 5/7] t1405: remove unneeded cleanup step Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-14 23:17   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-15  7:59     ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2024-02-09  7:23 ` [PATCH 6/7] t2011: exercise D/F conflicts with HEAD with the reftable backend Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-09  7:23 ` [PATCH 7/7] t7003: ensure filter-branch prunes reflogs " Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-11 14:00 ` [PATCH 0/7] t: drop more REFFILES prereqs Karthik Nayak
2024-02-14 23:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-15  8:14   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-15  8:25 ` [PATCH v2 " Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-15  8:25   ` [PATCH v2 1/7] t: move tests exercising the "files" backend Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-15  8:25   ` [PATCH v2 2/7] t0410: convert tests to use DEFAULT_REPO_FORMAT prereq Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-15 18:19     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-15  8:25   ` [PATCH v2 3/7] t1400: exercise reflog with gaps with reftable backend Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-15  8:25   ` [PATCH v2 4/7] t1404: make D/F conflict tests compatible " Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-15  8:25   ` [PATCH v2 5/7] t1405: remove unneeded cleanup step Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-15  8:25   ` [PATCH v2 6/7] t2011: exercise D/F conflicts with HEAD with the reftable backend Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-15  8:25   ` [PATCH v2 7/7] t7003: ensure filter-branch prunes reflogs " Patrick Steinhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zc3EdG7K0NqV61rC@tanuki \
    --to=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.