From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com,
masaharu.hayakawa.ry@renesas.com, takeshi.saito.xv@renesas.com,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Fix change point of data handling
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 15:51:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZcD17mTRnfIaueAW@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <237bd5c8-184d-4e46-ba66-253e3ef0c895@tuxon.dev>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1438 bytes --]
> > According to my understanding, we should only mark this TAP good if it
> > is in the range 5-7. I need to double check with Renesas, though.
>
> OK, my understanding is that it should be in the middle (beginning being
> the tap that triggered change point of the input data, end being the next
> tap with the same ID). This is what I understand from this: "As the width
> of the input data is 1 (UI), select TAP6 or TAP7 which is
>
> *the median* of next TAP3 from TAP3."
Yes, I agree. With 0x0e, that means TAP1+2+3 are changing points and we
should be far away from them, like 5-7.
But: I am still waiting for Renesas to answer my questions regarding
SMPCMP. I'd like to get that first, so we have clear facts then.
> > Boot failure is one test. Read/write tests should be another, I think.
>
> OK, I'll try also read/write. Do you have in mind something particular?
Nope. Just consistency checks.
> > Because if we select a bad TAP, bad things might happen later. To reduce
> > the amount of testing, read/write testing could only be triggered if the
> > new code path was excecuted?
>
> I'm not sure how to trigger that (or maybe I haven't understood your
> statement...)
I thought something in the lines of:
- print out when you needed SMPCMP to select a TAP
- check the log for that printout
- if (printout) do read_write_tests
Dunno if that makes sense with your test setup.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-05 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-05 11:27 [PATCH v3] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Fix change point of data handling Claudiu
2024-02-05 13:07 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-02-05 13:47 ` claudiu beznea
2024-02-05 14:51 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2024-02-06 13:35 ` claudiu beznea
2024-02-08 0:56 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-02-08 16:38 ` claudiu beznea
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZcD17mTRnfIaueAW@shikoro \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masaharu.hayakawa.ry@renesas.com \
--cc=takeshi.saito.xv@renesas.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.