From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] mm,page_owner: Display all stacks and their count
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 00:14:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZcaxxQE1PkepEWwf@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZcaesCP4mY-94ciJ@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 10:52:48PM +0100, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> Thinking about it some more, I think I made a mistake:
>
> I am walking all buckets, and within those buckets there are not only
> page_owner stack_records, which means that I could return a stack_record
> from e.g: KASAN (which I think can evict stack_records) and then
> everything goes off the rails.
> Which means I cannot walk the buckets like that.
>
> Actually, I think that having something like the following
>
> struct list_stack_records {
> struct stack_record *stack;
> struct list_stack_records *next;
> }
Or, I could use the extra_bits field from handle_parts to flag that
when a depot_stack_handle_t is used by page_owner.
Then __stack_depot_get_next_stack_record() would check whether
a stack_record->handle.extra_bits has the page_owner bit, and only
return those stacks that have such bit.
This would solve the problem of returning a potentially evictable stack
, only by returning page_owner's stack_records, and I would not have
to maintain my own list.
I yet have to see how that would look like, but sounds promising.
Do you think that is feasible Marco?
Thanks
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-09 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-08 23:45 [PATCH v7 0/4] page_owner: print stacks and their outstanding allocations Oscar Salvador
2024-02-08 23:45 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] lib/stackdepot: Move stack_record struct definition into the header Oscar Salvador
2024-02-09 7:45 ` Marco Elver
2024-02-09 21:33 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-02-09 17:39 ` kernel test robot
2024-02-10 9:59 ` kernel test robot
2024-02-08 23:45 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] mm,page_owner: Implement the tracking of the stacks count Oscar Salvador
2024-02-09 7:37 ` Marco Elver
2024-02-09 7:45 ` Marco Elver
2024-02-09 21:39 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-02-09 21:42 ` Marco Elver
2024-02-09 21:44 ` Marco Elver
2024-02-11 20:42 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-02-08 23:45 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] mm,page_owner: Display all stacks and their count Oscar Salvador
2024-02-09 8:00 ` Marco Elver
2024-02-09 21:52 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-02-09 23:14 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2024-02-10 7:52 ` Marco Elver
2024-02-11 20:39 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-02-12 10:47 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-02-09 23:14 ` kernel test robot
2024-02-08 23:45 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] mm,page_owner: Filter out stacks by a threshold Oscar Salvador
2024-02-09 0:28 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] page_owner: print stacks and their outstanding allocations Andrew Morton
2024-02-09 21:31 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-02-09 8:03 ` Marco Elver
2024-02-09 21:32 ` Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZcaxxQE1PkepEWwf@localhost.localdomain \
--to=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.