From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
To: Oliver Crumrine <ozlinuxc@gmail.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org, haoluo@google.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next] net: remove check in __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 08:49:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZcpMCnJMwbgiUMmE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7lv62yiyvmj5a7eozv2iznglpkydkdfancgmbhiptrgvgan5sy@3fl3onchgdz3>
On 02/09, Oliver Crumrine wrote:
> Originally, this patch removed a redundant check in
> BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_EGRESS, as the check was already being done in
> the function it called, __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb. For v2, it was
> reccomended that I remove the check from __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb,
> and add the checks to the other macro that calls that function,
> BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_INGRESS.
>
> To sum it up, checking that the socket exists and that it is a full
> socket is now part of both macros BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_EGRESS and
> BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_INGRESS, and it is no longer part of the
> function they call, __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Crumrine <ozlinuxc@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-12 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-09 19:41 [PATCH v4 bpf-next] net: remove check in __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb Oliver Crumrine
2024-02-12 16:49 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2024-02-13 18:37 ` Oliver Crumrine
2024-02-13 23:47 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-13 23:49 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2024-02-13 23:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZcpMCnJMwbgiUMmE@google.com \
--to=sdf@google.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=ozlinuxc@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.