All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Corentin LABBE <clabbe@baylibre.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] crypto: remove CONFIG_CRYPTO_STATS
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 21:37:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zd-ZbEQZEGU7sWbY@Red> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240223090334.167519-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>

Le Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 01:03:34AM -0800, Eric Biggers a écrit :
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> 
> Remove support for the "Crypto usage statistics" feature
> (CONFIG_CRYPTO_STATS).  This feature does not appear to have ever been
> used, and it is harmful because it significantly reduces performance and
> is a large maintenance burden.
> 
> Covering each of these points in detail:
> 
> 1. Feature is not being used
> 
> Since these generic crypto statistics are only readable using netlink,
> it's fairly straightforward to look for programs that use them.  I'm
> unable to find any evidence that any such programs exist.  For example,
> Debian Code Search returns no hits except the kernel header and kernel
> code itself and translations of the kernel header:
> https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=CRYPTOCFGA_STAT&literal=1&perpkg=1
> 
> The patch series that added this feature in 2018
> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/1537351855-16618-1-git-send-email-clabbe@baylibre.com/)
> said "The goal is to have an ifconfig for crypto device."  This doesn't
> appear to have happened.
> 
> It's not clear that there is real demand for crypto statistics.  Just
> because the kernel provides other types of statistics such as I/O and
> networking statistics and some people find those useful does not mean
> that crypto statistics are useful too.
> 
> Further evidence that programs are not using CONFIG_CRYPTO_STATS is that
> it was able to be disabled in RHEL and Fedora as a bug fix
> (https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/src/kernel/centos-stream-9/-/merge_requests/2947).
> 
> Even further evidence comes from the fact that there are and have been
> bugs in how the stats work, but they were never reported.  For example,
> before Linux v6.7 hash stats were double-counted in most cases.
> 
> There has also never been any documentation for this feature, so it
> might be hard to use even if someone wanted to.
> 
> 2. CONFIG_CRYPTO_STATS significantly reduces performance
> 
> Enabling CONFIG_CRYPTO_STATS significantly reduces the performance of
> the crypto API, even if no program ever retrieves the statistics.  This
> primarily affects systems with large number of CPUs.  For example,
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2039576 reported
> that Lustre client encryption performance improved from 21.7GB/s to
> 48.2GB/s by disabling CONFIG_CRYPTO_STATS.
> 
> It can be argued that this means that CONFIG_CRYPTO_STATS should be
> optimized with per-cpu counters similar to many of the networking
> counters.  But no one has done this in 5+ years.  This is consistent
> with the fact that the feature appears to be unused, so there seems to
> be little interest in improving it as opposed to just disabling it.
> 
> It can be argued that because CONFIG_CRYPTO_STATS is off by default,
> performance doesn't matter.  But Linux distros tend to error on the side
> of enabling options.  The option is enabled in Ubuntu and Arch Linux,
> and until recently was enabled in RHEL and Fedora (see above).  So, even
> just having the option available is harmful to users.
> 
> 3. CONFIG_CRYPTO_STATS is a large maintenance burden
> 
> There are over 1000 lines of code associated with CONFIG_CRYPTO_STATS,
> spread among 32 files.  It significantly complicates much of the
> implementation of the crypto API.  After the initial submission, many
> fixes and refactorings have consumed effort of multiple people to keep
> this feature "working".  We should be spending this effort elsewhere.
> 

Hello

I need to acknowledge that I am very probably the only one user of this.
I wished to have done more and better, but this is clearly a fail.
I am sorry and you can remove all of this.

Acked-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>

Regards


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-28 20:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-23  9:03 [RFC PATCH] crypto: remove CONFIG_CRYPTO_STATS Eric Biggers
2024-02-23 12:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-02-28 20:37 ` Corentin LABBE [this message]
2024-03-01 10:37 ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zd-ZbEQZEGU7sWbY@Red \
    --to=clabbe@baylibre.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.