From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qv1-f53.google.com (mail-qv1-f53.google.com [209.85.219.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54E8F145350 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 15:36:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.53 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709048202; cv=none; b=r+sjuMQ+0YcOCSdQvi9L0/zB6uyf+hyLuWO+5WFT9kYY36mz33xIoWb2zJ/d6BLP52BhjqrDPrlUJaLzraSSapKiKHLNP+7J1UlOpb7RKmafzwfU5Jz8jS2rBJRxL/io53XazwRU3ncFqOJP3Kj90NdA+VUrmx4tYo7czoY88KA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709048202; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5uF36SkL6j3rjU+v75xcUHnjNsRFkrV5u2gpq2J7cJY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=AOs6ypB7fiL3KDpHxTms6F4zmpzgEHooJtf9m+OGLBbTyB7iTPLL2iHA6uhCxTHtSAUurxdGTeVndFUvdoUKgPTVqZMXDynp2lWaSo/isT/T/3jfAoI27kbW+G0oqdvJ4ciRxctZsCBHIGgbHceiRqJRjNVcdQl+C+ybOFwknoo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.53 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Received: by mail-qv1-f53.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-69012259657so4044036d6.0 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 07:36:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709048200; x=1709653000; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=m2sGMg+51MVkfuFuHYE8WK5guxAx9KsEPslVkAQ6ODY=; b=g1HuIQfWLrvlPnbIYHpwSZg9nG/MyWGUU9FD/9T7aqt5jhMPGyE3hRS7WzbnkWA3cg SJliftIyafdv/x7sJ+2g6Pzrc3Uh4PU/NaGksSCHEvdQ/c4mLWqktzcQvpvIYtvPByMJ PDHcaAnYQ6/ow56rX7nGKasxnYw8ffDFeGcu/MoEOnvMtDIXFFz8ljIZPdhx6F2lsGhH iSR+190AUdYFF/doG754I4T7PAYuAe5VXnOgYURu/RgxSCQpi/yyk0XZYwOr31/Vm4dv r4vRBMdyMPF4Nyl4bv/w4nak5ZvzoDbydJ96J2QucygiCXIVpuaMXyNfYdVejTgxtlDn 78kQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU3nVwKi6jOyT+UhchKIPVGBAIAAgX23mE7Nb4beSySP1vwWW7ZY/CWE8p7imoSIk1838HHZfoUJjh9goOD5arpJ1eVtko6wqA= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywx8JIWO5uAz8jqL27Blrt0QXiZXbB/Cd+hDl2dJ9IMyhD0yBtb 1naDkV1mbAx9ABEXynji4e0vRYfII50wGl6h0wvSmAoRBF4ll0QA5q/ZsKmRlA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHefBd/DYeC9kDGOWZX34cDpyMowKjJqRD0RsTiq7qAUMMzIzL+c6tRbAmqftYr+t9pPcOiRw== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:f00f:0:b0:68f:6df2:3b60 with SMTP id z15-20020a0cf00f000000b0068f6df23b60mr2351854qvk.20.1709048200270; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 07:36:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (pool-68-160-141-91.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [68.160.141.91]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id og17-20020a056214429100b0068fe3170b0esm4259658qvb.11.2024.02.27.07.36.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 27 Feb 2024 07:36:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:36:37 -0500 From: Mike Snitzer To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jens Axboe , Mikulas Patocka , Song Liu , Yu Kuai , dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, lvm-devel@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: atomic queue limit updates for stackable devices Message-ID: References: <20240223161247.3998821-1-hch@lst.de> <20240227151016.GC14335@lst.de> <20240227151734.GA14628@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: dm-devel@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240227151734.GA14628@lst.de> On Tue, Feb 27 2024 at 10:17P -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 10:16:39AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > That's the mainline issue a bunch of MD (and dm-raid) oriented > > engineers are working hard to fix, they've been discussing on > > linux-raid (with many iterations of proposed patches). > > > > It regressed due to 6.8 MD changes (maybe earlier). > > > Do you know if there is a way to skip specific tests to get a useful > baseline value (and to complete the run?) I only know to sprinkle 'skip' code around to explicitly force the test to get skipped (e.g. in test/shell/, adding 'skip' at the top of each test as needed). But I've cc'd the lvm-devel mailing list in case there is an easier way.