From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: <John.C.Harrison@intel.com>
Cc: <Intel-GFX@lists.freedesktop.org>, <DRI-Devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/i915/guc: Simplify/extend platform check for Wa_14018913170
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:28:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZdO52xFiDGrfJ_cd@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240216183841.497768-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 10:38:41AM -0800, John.C.Harrison@Intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>
> The above w/a is required for every platform that the i915 driver
> supports. It is fixed on the latest platforms but they are only
> supported by Xe instead of i915. So just remove the platform check
> completely and keep the code simple.
Well, I was going to say that I would prefer a GMD version greater-than
check to be future proof. However if this code gets used in some other
new platform a new specific guc support would likely need to be added
as well right?
Perhaps at least adding a comment in the code?
with that
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c
> index 2b450c43bbd7f..a3662edb42032 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c
> @@ -321,8 +321,7 @@ static u32 guc_ctl_wa_flags(struct intel_guc *guc)
>
> /* Wa_14018913170 */
> if (GUC_FIRMWARE_VER(guc) >= MAKE_GUC_VER(70, 7, 0)) {
> - if (IS_DG2(gt->i915) || IS_METEORLAKE(gt->i915) || IS_PONTEVECCHIO(gt->i915))
> - flags |= GUC_WA_ENABLE_TSC_CHECK_ON_RC6;
> + flags |= GUC_WA_ENABLE_TSC_CHECK_ON_RC6;
> }
>
> return flags;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-19 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-16 18:38 [PATCH v3] drm/i915/guc: Simplify/extend platform check for Wa_14018913170 John.C.Harrison
2024-02-17 0:42 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2024-02-17 18:09 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2024-02-19 20:28 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-02-20 19:52 ` [PATCH v3] " John Harrison
2024-02-20 22:03 ` Rodrigo Vivi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-23 20:28 John.C.Harrison
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZdO52xFiDGrfJ_cd@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=DRI-Devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=Intel-GFX@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=John.C.Harrison@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.