All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <ZdY8EDfeePse3c1s@mail.minyard.net>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 21725c2..66dcf11 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:57:38AM -0600, Andrew Geissler wrote:
 > 
 > 
-> > On Feb 20, 2024, at 4:36?PM, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> wrote:
+> > On Feb 20, 2024, at 4:36 PM, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> wrote:
 > > 
 > > On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 13:33 -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:
 > >> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 04:51:21PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:57:38AM -0600, Andrew Geissler wrote:
 > > interrupts.
 > 
 > Yep, this is with the low level host boot firmware.
-> Also, further testing over night showed that 200us wasn?t enough for
+> Also, further testing over night showed that 200us wasn’t enough for
 > our larger Everest P10 machines, I needed to go to 300us. As we
 > were struggling to allow 200us, I assume 300us is going to be a no-go.
 
@@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ such and parallel execution.  Can this be fixed on the firmware side?
 > > 
 > 
 > Thanks for the quick reviews and ideas.
-> I?ll see if I can find someone on the team to help out with Andrew J?s
-> thoughts and if that doesn?t work, look into the kernel thread idea.
+> I’ll see if I can find someone on the team to help out with Andrew J’s
+> thoughts and if that doesn’t work, look into the kernel thread idea.
 
 I don't really understand Andrew J's ideas very well, but hopefully they
 help.  The kernel thread idea is fairly complicated to implement, and
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 65d24ac..8d3aaec 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -4,15 +4,22 @@
  "ref\09680ad7d7a48fc36a0572dc2286a1229a29341fe.camel@codeconstruct.com.au\0"
  "ref\0527F52AB-0070-43EA-BE82-945280CA2AEE@gmail.com\0"
  "From\0Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH] ipmi: kcs: Update OBF poll timeout to reduce latency\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] ipmi: kcs: Update OBF poll timeout to reduce latency\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 21 Feb 2024 12:08:16 -0600\0"
- "To\0linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org\0"
+ "To\0Andrew Geissler <geissonator@gmail.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>"
+  linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org>
+  openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org
+  Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
+  Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
+  openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
+ " Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:57:38AM -0600, Andrew Geissler wrote:\n"
  "> \n"
  "> \n"
- "> > On Feb 20, 2024, at 4:36?PM, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> wrote:\n"
+ "> > On Feb 20, 2024, at 4:36\342\200\257PM, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> wrote:\n"
  "> > \n"
  "> > On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 13:33 -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:\n"
  "> >> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 04:51:21PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:\n"
@@ -35,7 +42,7 @@
  "> > interrupts.\n"
  "> \n"
  "> Yep, this is with the low level host boot firmware.\n"
- "> Also, further testing over night showed that 200us wasn?t enough for\n"
+ "> Also, further testing over night showed that 200us wasn\342\200\231t enough for\n"
  "> our larger Everest P10 machines, I needed to go to 300us. As we\n"
  "> were struggling to allow 200us, I assume 300us is going to be a no-go.\n"
  "\n"
@@ -70,8 +77,8 @@
  "> > \n"
  "> \n"
  "> Thanks for the quick reviews and ideas.\n"
- "> I?ll see if I can find someone on the team to help out with Andrew J?s\n"
- "> thoughts and if that doesn?t work, look into the kernel thread idea.\n"
+ "> I\342\200\231ll see if I can find someone on the team to help out with Andrew J\342\200\231s\n"
+ "> thoughts and if that doesn\342\200\231t work, look into the kernel thread idea.\n"
  "\n"
  "I don't really understand Andrew J's ideas very well, but hopefully they\n"
  "help.  The kernel thread idea is fairly complicated to implement, and\n"
@@ -85,4 +92,4 @@
  "\n"
  -corey
 
-ecd2f0432e553052c6527c6a1f426c1f24bd775d274142b041bab09c48296131
+a6b15240238c2f2f9c426a41701e6b05c393f527641311756f205123de079a79

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index 21725c2..9f2b983 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:57:38AM -0600, Andrew Geissler wrote:
 > 
 > 
-> > On Feb 20, 2024, at 4:36?PM, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> wrote:
+> > On Feb 20, 2024, at 4:36 PM, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> wrote:
 > > 
 > > On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 13:33 -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:
 > >> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 04:51:21PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:57:38AM -0600, Andrew Geissler wrote:
 > > interrupts.
 > 
 > Yep, this is with the low level host boot firmware.
-> Also, further testing over night showed that 200us wasn?t enough for
+> Also, further testing over night showed that 200us wasn’t enough for
 > our larger Everest P10 machines, I needed to go to 300us. As we
 > were struggling to allow 200us, I assume 300us is going to be a no-go.
 
@@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ such and parallel execution.  Can this be fixed on the firmware side?
 > > 
 > 
 > Thanks for the quick reviews and ideas.
-> I?ll see if I can find someone on the team to help out with Andrew J?s
-> thoughts and if that doesn?t work, look into the kernel thread idea.
+> I’ll see if I can find someone on the team to help out with Andrew J’s
+> thoughts and if that doesn’t work, look into the kernel thread idea.
 
 I don't really understand Andrew J's ideas very well, but hopefully they
 help.  The kernel thread idea is fairly complicated to implement, and
@@ -73,3 +73,8 @@ talking about this code; I'm lothe to touch it for fear of breaking
 things.
 
 -corey
+
+_______________________________________________
+linux-arm-kernel mailing list
+linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index 65d24ac..99a5b69 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -4,15 +4,23 @@
  "ref\09680ad7d7a48fc36a0572dc2286a1229a29341fe.camel@codeconstruct.com.au\0"
  "ref\0527F52AB-0070-43EA-BE82-945280CA2AEE@gmail.com\0"
  "From\0Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH] ipmi: kcs: Update OBF poll timeout to reduce latency\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] ipmi: kcs: Update OBF poll timeout to reduce latency\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 21 Feb 2024 12:08:16 -0600\0"
- "To\0linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org\0"
+ "To\0Andrew Geissler <geissonator@gmail.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>"
+  Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
+  Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
+  openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
+  Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
+  linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org>
+  Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
+ " openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:57:38AM -0600, Andrew Geissler wrote:\n"
  "> \n"
  "> \n"
- "> > On Feb 20, 2024, at 4:36?PM, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> wrote:\n"
+ "> > On Feb 20, 2024, at 4:36\342\200\257PM, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> wrote:\n"
  "> > \n"
  "> > On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 13:33 -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:\n"
  "> >> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 04:51:21PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:\n"
@@ -35,7 +43,7 @@
  "> > interrupts.\n"
  "> \n"
  "> Yep, this is with the low level host boot firmware.\n"
- "> Also, further testing over night showed that 200us wasn?t enough for\n"
+ "> Also, further testing over night showed that 200us wasn\342\200\231t enough for\n"
  "> our larger Everest P10 machines, I needed to go to 300us. As we\n"
  "> were struggling to allow 200us, I assume 300us is going to be a no-go.\n"
  "\n"
@@ -70,8 +78,8 @@
  "> > \n"
  "> \n"
  "> Thanks for the quick reviews and ideas.\n"
- "> I?ll see if I can find someone on the team to help out with Andrew J?s\n"
- "> thoughts and if that doesn?t work, look into the kernel thread idea.\n"
+ "> I\342\200\231ll see if I can find someone on the team to help out with Andrew J\342\200\231s\n"
+ "> thoughts and if that doesn\342\200\231t work, look into the kernel thread idea.\n"
  "\n"
  "I don't really understand Andrew J's ideas very well, but hopefully they\n"
  "help.  The kernel thread idea is fairly complicated to implement, and\n"
@@ -83,6 +91,11 @@
  "talking about this code; I'm lothe to touch it for fear of breaking\n"
  "things.\n"
  "\n"
- -corey
+ "-corey\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n"
+ "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n"
+ http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
 
-ecd2f0432e553052c6527c6a1f426c1f24bd775d274142b041bab09c48296131
+5734795d3773a8829b8f1bea172d1633bd8bf4d409a8c3de5d8eb9b870a4b5a3

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N3/1.txt
index 21725c2..66dcf11 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N3/1.txt
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:57:38AM -0600, Andrew Geissler wrote:
 > 
 > 
-> > On Feb 20, 2024, at 4:36?PM, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> wrote:
+> > On Feb 20, 2024, at 4:36 PM, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> wrote:
 > > 
 > > On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 13:33 -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:
 > >> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 04:51:21PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:57:38AM -0600, Andrew Geissler wrote:
 > > interrupts.
 > 
 > Yep, this is with the low level host boot firmware.
-> Also, further testing over night showed that 200us wasn?t enough for
+> Also, further testing over night showed that 200us wasn’t enough for
 > our larger Everest P10 machines, I needed to go to 300us. As we
 > were struggling to allow 200us, I assume 300us is going to be a no-go.
 
@@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ such and parallel execution.  Can this be fixed on the firmware side?
 > > 
 > 
 > Thanks for the quick reviews and ideas.
-> I?ll see if I can find someone on the team to help out with Andrew J?s
-> thoughts and if that doesn?t work, look into the kernel thread idea.
+> I’ll see if I can find someone on the team to help out with Andrew J’s
+> thoughts and if that doesn’t work, look into the kernel thread idea.
 
 I don't really understand Andrew J's ideas very well, but hopefully they
 help.  The kernel thread idea is fairly complicated to implement, and
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest
index 65d24ac..89dc1d7 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N3/content_digest
@@ -4,15 +4,23 @@
  "ref\09680ad7d7a48fc36a0572dc2286a1229a29341fe.camel@codeconstruct.com.au\0"
  "ref\0527F52AB-0070-43EA-BE82-945280CA2AEE@gmail.com\0"
  "From\0Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH] ipmi: kcs: Update OBF poll timeout to reduce latency\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] ipmi: kcs: Update OBF poll timeout to reduce latency\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 21 Feb 2024 12:08:16 -0600\0"
- "To\0linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org\0"
+ "To\0Andrew Geissler <geissonator@gmail.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>"
+  Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
+  Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
+  openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
+  Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
+  linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org>
+  Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
+ " openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:57:38AM -0600, Andrew Geissler wrote:\n"
  "> \n"
  "> \n"
- "> > On Feb 20, 2024, at 4:36?PM, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> wrote:\n"
+ "> > On Feb 20, 2024, at 4:36\342\200\257PM, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> wrote:\n"
  "> > \n"
  "> > On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 13:33 -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:\n"
  "> >> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 04:51:21PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:\n"
@@ -35,7 +43,7 @@
  "> > interrupts.\n"
  "> \n"
  "> Yep, this is with the low level host boot firmware.\n"
- "> Also, further testing over night showed that 200us wasn?t enough for\n"
+ "> Also, further testing over night showed that 200us wasn\342\200\231t enough for\n"
  "> our larger Everest P10 machines, I needed to go to 300us. As we\n"
  "> were struggling to allow 200us, I assume 300us is going to be a no-go.\n"
  "\n"
@@ -70,8 +78,8 @@
  "> > \n"
  "> \n"
  "> Thanks for the quick reviews and ideas.\n"
- "> I?ll see if I can find someone on the team to help out with Andrew J?s\n"
- "> thoughts and if that doesn?t work, look into the kernel thread idea.\n"
+ "> I\342\200\231ll see if I can find someone on the team to help out with Andrew J\342\200\231s\n"
+ "> thoughts and if that doesn\342\200\231t work, look into the kernel thread idea.\n"
  "\n"
  "I don't really understand Andrew J's ideas very well, but hopefully they\n"
  "help.  The kernel thread idea is fairly complicated to implement, and\n"
@@ -85,4 +93,4 @@
  "\n"
  -corey
 
-ecd2f0432e553052c6527c6a1f426c1f24bd775d274142b041bab09c48296131
+3787ff27d98759194010a0706b3680da62ef9267f6959c896398b53334ffc291

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.