Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] KVM: SEV: allow customizing VMSA features

[Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>]

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini (11):
>   KVM: SEV: fix compat ABI for KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_OP
>   KVM: introduce new vendor op for KVM_GET_DEVICE_ATTR
>   Documentation: kvm/sev: separate description of firmware
>   KVM: SEV: publish supported VMSA features
>   KVM: SEV: store VMSA features in kvm_sev_info
>   KVM: SEV: disable DEBUG_SWAP by default
>   KVM: x86: define standard behavior for bits 0/1 of VM type
>   KVM: x86: Add is_vm_type_supported callback
>   KVM: SEV: define VM types for SEV and SEV-ES
>   KVM: SEV: introduce KVM_SEV_INIT2 operation
>   selftests: kvm: add tests for KVM_SEV_INIT2
> 
>  Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst                |   2 +
>  .../virt/kvm/x86/amd-memory-encryption.rst    |  81 +++++++--
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h            |   2 +
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h               |  11 +-
>  arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h               |  35 ++++
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c                        | 110 +++++++++++-
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c                        |  14 +-
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h                        |   6 +-
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                            | 157 ++++++++++++++----
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile          |   1 +
>  .../selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h     |   6 +-
>  .../selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c    |   8 +-
>  .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/sev_init2_tests.c    | 146 ++++++++++++++++
>  13 files changed, 510 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sev_init2_tests.c

FYI, there are 4-5 minor conflicts with kvm-x86/next, and going off my memory, I
think the conflicts come from ~3 different topic branches.

Given that this is based on kvm/next, I assume it's destined for 6.9.  So maybe
rebase on kvm-x86/next for v3, and then I'll get my 6.9 pull requests sent for
the conflicting branches early next week so that this can land in a topic branch
that's based on kvm/next?