Re: [PATCH for-6.9] workqueue: Drain BH work items on hot-unplugged CPUs

[Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 10:37:28AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 03:38:55PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Boqun pointed out that workqueues aren't handling BH work items on offlined
> > CPUs. Unlike tasklet which transfers out the pending tasks from
> > CPUHP_SOFTIRQ_DEAD, BH workqueue would just leave them pending which is
> > problematic. Note that this behavior is specific to BH workqueues as the
> > non-BH per-CPU workers just become unbound when the CPU goes offline.
> > 
> > This patch fixes the issue by draining the pending BH work items from an
> > offlined CPU from CPUHP_SOFTIRQ_DEAD. Because work items carry more context,
> > it's not as easy to transfer the pending work items from one pool to
> > another. Instead, run BH work items which execute the offlined pools on an
> > online CPU.
> > 
> > Note that this assumes that no further BH work items will be queued on the
> > offlined CPUs. This assumption is shared with tasklet and should be fine for
> > conversions. However, this issue also exists for per-CPU workqueues which
> > will just keep executing work items queued after CPU offline on unbound
> > workers and workqueue should reject per-CPU and BH work items queued on
> > offline CPUs. This will be addressed separately later.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> > Reported-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/Zdvw0HdSXcU3JZ4g@boqun-archlinux
> 
> Applying this to wq/for-6.9.
> 

FWIW,

Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>

(I took a look yesterday, but hasn't gotten the time to reply..)

Regards,
Boqun

> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> tejun