All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	paulmck@kernel.org, lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Reclamation interactions with RCU
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 02:48:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZeFCFGc8Gncpstd8@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <l25hltgrr5epdzrdxsx6lgzvvtzfqxhnnvdru7vfjozdfhl4eh@xvl42xplak3u>

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 09:39:17PM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 01:16:18PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > Insisting that GFP_KERNEL allocations never returned NULL would allow us
> > to remove a lot of untested error handling code....
> 
> If memcg ever gets enabled for all kernel side allocations we might
> start seeing failures of GFP_KERNEL allocations.

Why would we want that behaviour?  A memcg-limited allocation should
behave like any other allocation -- block until we've freed some other
memory in this cgroup, either by swap or killing or ...

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-01  2:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-27 18:56 [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Reclamation interactions with RCU Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-27 19:19 ` [Lsf-pc] " Amir Goldstein
2024-02-27 22:59   ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-03-01  3:28     ` Kent Overstreet
2024-03-05  2:43       ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-03-05  2:56       ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-02-28 19:37   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-02-29  1:29     ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-29  4:20       ` Kent Overstreet
2024-02-29  4:17     ` Kent Overstreet
2024-02-29  4:24       ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-02-29  4:44         ` Kent Overstreet
2024-03-01  2:16     ` NeilBrown
2024-03-01  2:39       ` Kent Overstreet
2024-03-01  2:48         ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2024-03-01  3:09           ` Kent Overstreet
2024-03-01  3:33             ` James Bottomley
2024-03-01  3:52               ` Kent Overstreet
2024-03-01  4:01                 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-03-01  4:09                   ` NeilBrown
2024-03-01  4:18                     ` Kent Overstreet
2024-03-01  4:18                   ` James Bottomley
2024-03-01  4:08                 ` James Bottomley
2024-03-01  4:15                   ` Kent Overstreet
2024-03-05  2:54           ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-03-01  5:54       ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-01 20:20         ` Kent Overstreet
2024-03-01 23:47           ` NeilBrown
2024-03-02  0:02             ` Kent Overstreet
2024-03-02 11:33               ` Tetsuo Handa
2024-03-02 16:53                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-03 22:45               ` NeilBrown
2024-03-03 22:54                 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-03-04  0:20                 ` Dave Chinner
2024-03-04  1:16                   ` NeilBrown
2024-03-04  0:35                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-04  1:27                   ` NeilBrown
2024-03-04  2:05                   ` Kent Overstreet
2024-03-12 14:46                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-03-12 22:09                   ` NeilBrown
2024-03-20 18:32                   ` Dan Carpenter
2024-03-20 18:48                     ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-03-20 18:55                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-20 19:07                         ` Kent Overstreet
2024-03-20 19:14                           ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-20 19:33                             ` Kent Overstreet
2024-03-20 19:09                     ` Kent Overstreet
2024-03-21  6:27                 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-03-22  1:47                   ` NeilBrown
2024-03-22  6:13                     ` Dan Carpenter
2024-03-24 22:31                       ` NeilBrown
2024-03-25  8:43                         ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZeFCFGc8Gncpstd8@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.