Re: [PATCH 2/2] clock_nanosleep.2, nanosleep.2: Use 'duration' rather than 'request'

[Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1131 bytes --]

Hi Elliott,

On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 04:18:28PM -0800, enh wrote:
> thanks! https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/bionic/+/2987070
> changes to
> 
> /**
>  * [clock_nanosleep(2)](http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/clock_nanosleep.2.html)
>  * sleeps for the given time (or until the given time if the TIMER_ABSTIME flag
>  * is used), as measured by the given clock.
>  *
>  * Returns 0 on success, and returns -1 and returns an error number on failure.
>  * If the sleep was interrupted by a signal, the return value will be `EINTR`
>  * and `remainder` will be the amount of time remaining.
>  */
> int clock_nanosleep(clockid_t __clock, int __flags, const struct
> timespec* _Nonnull __time, struct timespec* _Nullable __remainder);

Hmmmm, that's the best name, meaningfully, I think.  But I've been
trying to avoid it.  I don't like using names of standard functions in
identifiers; it might confuse.  As an alternative, I thought of 't'.
What do you think?

Have a lovely night!

Alex

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
Looking for a remote C programming job at the moment.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]