Re: [PATCH] arm64: zynqmp: Do not describe u-boot.itb if SPL is disabled

[Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>]

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 05:18:42PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> There is no reason to describe u-boot.itb on system without SPL. Pretty
> much this is cover all systems which are using only boot.bin which contains
> all images inside.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
> ---
>
>  board/xilinx/common/board.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/board/xilinx/common/board.c b/board/xilinx/common/board.c
> index 9641ed307b75..4f38b7d27684 100644
> --- a/board/xilinx/common/board.c
> +++ b/board/xilinx/common/board.c
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ struct efi_fw_image fw_images[] = {
>  		.image_index = 1,
>  	},
>  #endif
> -#if defined(XILINX_UBOOT_IMAGE_GUID)
> +#if defined(XILINX_UBOOT_IMAGE_GUID) && defined(CONFIG_SPL_FS_LOAD_PAYLOAD_NAME)

What happens if this is defined with CONFIG_SPL_FS_LOAD_PAYLOAD_NAME="" ?

Cheers
/Ilias
>  	{
>  		.image_type_id = XILINX_UBOOT_IMAGE_GUID,
>  		.fw_name = u"XILINX-UBOOT",
> --
> 2.36.1
>