All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	martin.lau@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 5/6] bpf: add bpf_test_tp() kfunc triggering tp and allowing error injection
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:12:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zf2DzQmhI2e8UGrx@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240322000041.2919948-6-andrii@kernel.org>

On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 05:00:40PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> Add a simple bpf_test_tp() kfunc, available to all program types, that
> is useful for various testing and benchmarking scenarios, as it allows
> to trigger most tracing BPF program types from BPF side, allowing to do
> complex testing and benchmarking scenarios.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

I'm getting compilation fail with this one:

  INSTALL libsubcmd_headers
  INSTALL libsubcmd_headers
  CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
  CC      kernel/bpf/helpers.o
In file included from kernel/bpf/bpf_test.h:34,
                 from kernel/bpf/helpers.c:30:
./include/trace/define_trace.h:95:42: fatal error: ./bpf_test.h: No such file or directory
   95 | #include TRACE_INCLUDE(TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE)
      |                                          ^

jirka

> ---
>  kernel/bpf/bpf_test.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/bpf/helpers.c  | 13 +++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 kernel/bpf/bpf_test.h
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_test.h b/kernel/bpf/bpf_test.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c779927d3574
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_test.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
> +#define TRACE_SYSTEM bpf_test
> +
> +#if !defined(_TRACE_BPF_TEST_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
> +
> +#define _TRACE_BPF_TEST_H
> +
> +#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(bpf_test,
> +
> +	TP_PROTO(int nonce),
> +
> +	TP_ARGS(nonce),
> +
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +		__field(int, nonce)
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_fast_assign(
> +		__entry->nonce = nonce;
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_printk("nonce %d", __entry->nonce)
> +);
> +
> +#endif /* _TRACE_BPF_TEST_H */
> +
> +#undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH
> +#define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH .
> +#define TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE bpf_test
> +
> +#include <trace/define_trace.h>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> index 9234174ccb21..67bf9659c447 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,10 @@
>  
>  #include "../../lib/kstrtox.h"
>  
> +#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> +#include "bpf_test.h"
> +
> +
>  /* If kernel subsystem is allowing eBPF programs to call this function,
>   * inside its own verifier_ops->get_func_proto() callback it should return
>   * bpf_map_lookup_elem_proto, so that verifier can properly check the arguments
> @@ -2549,6 +2553,14 @@ __bpf_kfunc void bpf_throw(u64 cookie)
>  	WARN(1, "A call to BPF exception callback should never return\n");
>  }
>  
> +__bpf_kfunc int bpf_test_tp(int nonce)
> +{
> +	trace_bpf_test(nonce);
> +
> +	return nonce;
> +}
> +ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(bpf_test_tp, ERRNO);
> +
>  __bpf_kfunc_end_defs();
>  
>  BTF_KFUNCS_START(generic_btf_ids)
> @@ -2625,6 +2637,7 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_is_null)
>  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly)
>  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_size)
>  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_clone)
> +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_test_tp)
>  BTF_KFUNCS_END(common_btf_ids)
>  
>  static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set common_kfunc_set = {
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-22 13:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-22  0:00 [PATCH bpf-next 0/6] bench: fast in-kernel triggering benchmarks Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-22  0:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/6] selftests/bpf: rename and clean up userspace-triggered benchmarks Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-22  0:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/6] selftests/bpf: add batched, mostly in-kernel BPF triggering benchmarks Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-25 17:21   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-25 23:21     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-22  0:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/6] selftests/bpf: remove syscall-driven benchs, keep syscall-count only Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-22  0:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/6] selftests/bpf: lazy-load trigger bench BPF programs Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-22  0:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/6] bpf: add bpf_test_tp() kfunc triggering tp and allowing error injection Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-22 13:12   ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2024-03-22 16:52     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-25 17:36   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-25 22:19     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-26  1:43       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-26  2:32         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-26 10:57         ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-22  0:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: add batched tp/raw_tp/fmodret tests Andrii Nakryiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zf2DzQmhI2e8UGrx@krava \
    --to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.