All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nftables documentation improvement?
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 22:03:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zf9DskY3QHAIBGLE@calendula> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zf6Y2s6eyrhlWLZz@nataraja>

Hi Harald,

On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 09:54:50AM +0100, Harald Welte wrote:
> Dear netfilter project,
> 
> In my recent interaction explaining nftables to some other users I am
> under the impression that there is likely some improvement possible to
> the nftables wiki.
> 
> The wiki is full of details about the individual expressions, actions,
> etc. - but I think what's lacking (or I couldn't find it) is some kind
> of conscise overall description of the terminology + the general
> high-level architecture of the ruleset.
> 
> You can find some description in the first two paragraphs of 
> https://wiki.nftables.org/wiki-nftables/index.php/Simple_rule_management
> but that doesn't define the terms used (action, expression, statement,
> ...)
> 
> You can find an overview of the terms used in
> https://wiki.nftables.org/wiki-nftables/index.php/Quick_reference-nftables_in_10_minutes
> [but then actually with imprecise language like "rule refers to an
> action to be configured within a chain." while a rule actually consists
> of matching expressions and an action"]
> 
> I'd be willing to try to write a proposed improvded text expressing what
> I have in mind.  I'd prefer to do that as some separate wiki page as a
> draft for you guys to review before deciding whether to use it in the
> main wiki pages.  I just didn't want to write it as unformatted
> plain-text here in e-mail and then later have to re-format in wiki
> syntax.

That's fine, I should have written that already myself, your help is
welcome on this.

> So in short: If anybody would be willing to add an account for me, I'd
> give it a shot and you can decide if you think what I'd consider an
> improvement is also one in your point of view.

Just sent you credentials in a private email.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-23 21:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-23  8:54 nftables documentation improvement? Harald Welte
2024-03-23 21:03 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2024-03-26 13:59   ` Harald Welte

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zf9DskY3QHAIBGLE@calendula \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=laforge@gnumonks.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.