Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/73] 5.10.213-rc1 review

[Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>]

Sasha Levin wrote on Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:45:27PM -0400:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.213 release.
> There are 73 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

Thanks Sasha for submitting a stable rc review!

If it's not too much trouble, would it be possible to have a different
header in the 00 patch from the other patches for my mailbox?
The mails Greg sends have the X-KernelTest-* headers (patch, tree,
branch etc) only in the cover letter, while all the patches themselves
only have 'X-stable: review' and 'X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore'

I don't really care much what actual tags are on which as long as
there's a way to differentiate that cover letter from the rest so I can
redirect it to a mailbox I actually read to notice there's a new rc to
test, without having all the patches unless I explicitly look for them.

If it's difficult I'll add a regex on the subject for ' 00/' or
something, I'd prefer matching only headers for robustness but just let
me know.


Didn't run into any problem with the patches themselves:

> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/patch/?id=linux-5.10.y&id2=v5.10.212
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.

Tested 0a70dd1e1aa9 ("Linux 5.10.213-rc1") on:
- arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640)
- arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4)

No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests:
Tested-by: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com>

-- 
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus