From: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
To: наб <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz>
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] proc_pid_io.5: dewafflify
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 15:12:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zfb6XoFd_Xw9qa9j@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5b5a5e461deafb011c815023001424b0dbc2836f.1710682230.git.nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5571 bytes --]
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 02:31:21PM +0100, наб wrote:
[...]
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahelenia Ziemiańska <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz>
> ---
> Hi!
Hi!
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 01:15:18PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 12:01:41PM +0100, наб wrote:
> > > -The number of bytes
> > > -which this task and its waited-for children
> > > -have caused to be read from storage.
> > > -This is simply the sum of bytes which this process passed to
> > > +The number of bytes returned by successful
> > In this case, I think I prefer to break before "returned".
> > What would you do?
> this is a "meh" moment imo; in running text sure, maybe,
> but this is broken up by the .BR
> so it starts to devolve into 3-word-line territory which is worse
Hmm, the good part is that the diff doesn't include the first part of
the sentence.
> > > -Attempt to count the number of read I/O operations\[em]that is,
> > > -system calls such as
> > > +The number of "I/O read" system calls\[em]those from the
> > From I/O, read only accounts for the I. :)
> > Should we just say "read"?
> Yeah, "I/O" is overloaded here; "file read" works better.
>
> > > .BR read (2)
> > > +family
> > > +(including when invoked used by the kernel as part of other syscalls),
> > This parenthesis being there seems to imply that if the kernel calls
> > sendfile internally for $reasons (even if it doesn't at the moment), it
> > won't be counted. I think it makes more sense at the end of the list,
> > no?
> Well, as-is it doesn't, and I reduced this to the narrowest definition
> I can prove, but I guess so, yes.
>
> Also just noticed "invoked used".
>
> man5/proc_pid_io.5 | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/man5/proc_pid_io.5 b/man5/proc_pid_io.5
> index dc75a91de..7f840f3bb 100644
> --- a/man5/proc_pid_io.5
> +++ b/man5/proc_pid_io.5
> @@ -33,63 +33,56 @@ .SH DESCRIPTION
> .TP
> .IR rchar ": characters read"
> The number of bytes
> -which this task and its waited-for children
> -have caused to be read from storage.
> -This is simply the sum of bytes which this process passed to
> +returned by successful
> .BR read (2)
> and similar system calls.
> -It includes things such as terminal I/O and
> -is unaffected by whether or not actual
> -physical disk I/O was required (the read might have been satisfied from
> -pagecache).
> .TP
> .IR wchar ": characters written"
> The number of bytes
> -which this task and its waited-for children
> -have caused, or shall cause to be written to disk.
> -Similar caveats apply here as with
> -.IR rchar .
> +returned by successful
> +.BR write (2)
> +and similar system calls.
> .TP
> .IR syscr ": read syscalls"
> -Attempt to count the number of read I/O operations\[em]that is,
> -system calls such as
> +The number of "file read" system calls\[em]those from the
> .BR read (2)
> +family
> +.BR sendfile (2),
> +.BR copy_file_range (2),
> and
> -.BR pread (2).
> +.BR ioctl (2)
> +.BR BTRFS_IOC_ENCODED_READ [ _32 ]
> +(including when invoked by the kernel as part of other syscalls),
s/,/./
> .TP
> .IR syscw ": write syscalls"
> -Attempt to count the number of write I/O operations\[em]that is,
> -system calls such as
> +The number of "file write" system calls\[em]those from the
> .BR write (2)
> +family
> +.BR sendfile (2),
> +.BR copy_file_range (2),
> and
> -.BR pwrite (2).
> +.BR ioctl (2)
> +.BR BTRFS_IOC_ENCODED_WRITE [ _32 ]
> +(including when invoked by the kernel as part of other syscalls),
s/,/./
> .TP
> .IR read_bytes ": bytes read"
> -Attempt to count the number of bytes
> -which this process and its waited-for children
> -really did cause to be fetched from the storage layer.
> +The number of bytes really fetched from the storage layer.
> This is accurate for block-backed filesystems.
> .TP
> .IR write_bytes ": bytes written"
> -Attempt to count the number of bytes
> -which this process and its waited-for children
> -caused to be sent to the storage layer.
> +The number of bytes really sent to the storage layer.
> .TP
> .IR cancelled_write_bytes :
> -The big inaccuracy here is truncate.
> -If a process writes 1 MB to a file and then deletes the file,
> -it will in fact perform no writeout.
> -But it will have been accounted as having caused 1 MB of write.
> -In other words:
> -this field represents the number of bytes
> -which this process and its waited-for children
> -caused to not happen, by truncating pagecache.
> -A task can cause "negative" I/O too.
> -If this task truncates some dirty pagecache,
> -some I/O which another task has been accounted for
> -(in its
> -.IR write_bytes )
> -will not be happening.
> +The above statistics fail to account for truncation:
> +if a process writes 1 MB to a regular file and then removes it,
> +said 1 MB will not be written, but
> +.I will
> +have nevertheless been accounted as a 1 MB write.
> +This field represents the number of bytes "saved" from I/O writeback.
> +This can yield to having done negative I/O
> +if caches dirtied by another process are truncated.
> +This figure applies to I/O already accounted-for by
> +.IR write_bytes .
I'm not sure I understand this last sentence. What does "this figure"
refer to exactly?
Have a lovely day!
Alex
> .RE
> .IP
> .IR Note :
> --
> 2.39.2
--
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-17 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-13 14:26 [PATCH 1/6] proc_pid_io.5: stats include children наб
2024-03-13 14:26 ` [PATCH 2/6] proc_pid_io.5: dewafflify наб
2024-03-14 16:21 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-03-13 14:26 ` [PATCH 3/6] proc_pid_io.5: wfix наб
2024-03-14 16:22 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-03-13 14:26 ` [PATCH 4/6] proc_pid_io.5: mention atomicity in atomicity note наб
2024-03-14 16:28 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-03-13 14:26 ` [PATCH 5/6] getrusage.2: proc(5) /proc/pid/stat -> proc_pid_stat(5) наб
2024-03-14 16:31 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-03-13 14:26 ` [PATCH 6/6] getrusage.2, proc_pid_io.5: crosslink наб
2024-03-14 16:33 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-03-14 16:19 ` [PATCH 1/6] proc_pid_io.5: stats include children Alejandro Colomar
2024-03-17 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] proc_pid_io.5: dewafflify наб
2024-03-17 12:15 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-03-17 13:31 ` [PATCH v3] " наб
2024-03-17 14:12 ` Alejandro Colomar [this message]
2024-03-17 15:37 ` [PATCH v4] " наб
2024-03-17 16:08 ` Alejandro Colomar
2024-03-17 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] proc_pid_io.5: stats include children наб
2024-03-17 11:39 ` Alejandro Colomar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zfb6XoFd_Xw9qa9j@debian \
--to=alx@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.